the second reading, though not prepared to 
tails of the Bill.—Ma: ted the E BERESFORD, ty 
go Mr. W. 
tad’ 
q mi ve hare e CHANCELLOR of the Excue- 
ves, the Panki ne “(Scotland it was read a third time and 
À passed,- .—On the motion for the second reading of the Poor-law 
not to ogo the Bill, 
F in order to insure to 
d de liberat te prate ation.— 
ATE rare he w foal be boca willing to consider 
most tttentively the objections and 
| Rutherford Uriah er pe Bill should go. 
| entertaine: ed a arre hee ae the Bill world be productive 
of e people of Ponana, and that the 
| would be n: s pas: ou, 
_ mittee to ies to pes m 
suggested, so st hat it t might completely accomp lish th 
for which it was intended- —Mr. Aide 
surrounded by diffi 
gs 
measures ompel them. The hon so 
went into ioir details, in or der to show that the 1 new "system 
mare be Sutherland since 1815 had 
Targest benefi 
THE NEWSPAPER. 
made application to the G t of d 
sugar grown in the ray peor England to admit the 
in posse: f Government confirmato: 
participa: ania direct z in Paige of British subjects i = = " 
ee charged i = na? Tyler’s message to Congres: 
; andif so, whether there is en pasta 
rod st md ao pr ‘such documents? Also, whether Govern- 
ment can furnish to the House th the names e es aii, om 
of any of those vessels alleged by Mr. eg e bee 
loaded with goods for the sisvo-trado, "beha if 
an; cha a5 
pi aga n the 
m or else was oan yen mtra red 
ts stated I iy the Present, "but if the facts ecg 
he parties were Boag to op romena. poe inform: 
tion upon the subject in th sion of the Government wa: 
bh 
s justice of the 
e 
193 
because “ pp gp hacer E S de> 
a doubt of the en S f the case, and of 
ch ought to be final = 
Mr. Russell also 
rs from the publie 
press at the ne ys that “the presence of 
the te seri the under her "the eae ne the ordi- 
subordi rison, 
verdi d oft 
confidence i in agg vert whi 
reby — 
sista aap 
pest dame ra rag to the 
sary pi — of ing and oi 
| the prisoner for the seaffo Id will@ee conducted with all 
oe consideration for the culprit, and without the — 
ecessary suffe ering or delay. I am, there 
A = pated sont be 
rea ach en 
well as th at of a condemned sermon, all persons except 
J. Grauam moved the order of the day for the House resol 
itself into a committee of the Loree eos on = e ts lle 
e _ His object was 
ving 
eges 
of the 
li 
es.—Sir R. Ineuis ae his pS Team to the Bill 
ie a vere but he w ey not ane the House “serge a 
present occasion.—Mr. W. S. O’Brizn then proceeded t 
to the House the opinions of the sci of Ireland upoi on 
measure. [Left speaking.] 
City. 
Money Market, Friday.—Consols for the account 
closed at 99}; Reduced Three per Cents. 993; Three- 
and-Quarter, New, 1028; Bank Stock, 2114 ; Exchequer 
Bills, 59s. to 61s. pi 
H. Bext, Staffordshire’ 
m City, wine smreeRE OT! 
GA TE OF THE WEEK. 
ESD. Pe iag Hekseri s 
ete mar J. B. inanaga Bishopsgate-str 
RUPTS—G. well-street, Weieaiie er, = 
Fon ne Vanes Isle of wi he rere bese a Pisnea, Lynn. soir oa navel 
C. Darro n ean? bridge, Old Kent- = oad, stone mason—C. T. Hicks, Una 
Thames-street, drug a Bres Paver, Pudsey, Yorkshire, ee 
miller—G, iioasy Laig whole: mg pim aiae Keng Aprea 
Lyne, licensed victualler— . Jones, V wardine, Shropshire, 
Badoha SEQUEST a fe aiins draper—' 
ag victualler—J. Man G saa 
TS—H. yi D, Ch eltenham, 
i 
de: ~G. H. Ger, and G. C. ” Gazex, ‘Barge yaris hosten baker a whole- | 
sale rada J. Baio Ra, Ipswich, fruiterer—W. Yoon, and J. Horses, 
eg ove ent, woh pen ai P= Frox, Barnard Castle, Darham, ca 
THWAITE, eth, Northumberlaadshire—W. Granox 
Boa: Ernie EE Ins cued "erctualier, 
SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS—a. Fru, Edin burgh, tai 
 Seletropolls a n. Biche. 
s -South com- 
nouncing | 
“th 
comet. With my 5-feet equatorial I 
minutes after llo clock, its approximate right as 
stitute 
| declined, i in goons to receive the tende: 
of Mr. Oa 
ti P R Jad 
ta! = The Mr. Oakeley’s Case:—The suit 
of Justice in the | ATCHeS On institute a x he Bishop of Lon 
m to write to the | against } Mr. Oakeley, ca! Sir H. panies, Fust, 
une cil, with a view tojon Tuesday. Previous to oe hearin vè Oakeley had 
having an | inquiry into the whole su oat ect.—In reply to Lord Fiat 
J. RUSSELL, the SOLICITOR-GENERAL A that the Re f anes the, follo owing vaen er to the bishop + 
the Committee of Privilege (Howard v. Gossett) © ord,—The circumstances of the | inst, few months have 
ready on 1 Mo nday aja to the ilinass of e procter Gir. ©: forced Le gad ar a painful but orerpowering Tapto oe see 
W. Wynn), and he would therefore postpone the adjourned difficulties which actually beset my position and my path as a 
debate which stood ae Monday, pear Thu wns fortnie at clergyman ministering in the Church of England. nd many 
= these difficulties are of a kind w 
A 
of rmination in 
my favour of the suit which your caused 
instituted fn bane me in wea Court of Arches would not serve to 
remove. After giving, then, to a subject the full and mature 
de eston x tro its Actes emands, I have determined 
tha tla 
rhich even the te 
Lordship has 
any formal ans 
and in 
re tg he ete al indeterm 
preston by the fact ree ‘Lords havi: Rte swat 
letter to you the groui uiry. The 
the cause, Suen the a gs tate 
0 the 
rches. ‘And I feel 
lution to haige to your rie rdsh ip the re ation of thy 
as minister of Margaret Chapel, with the view of putting an 
end, both for your Tordship: and for mee: to mas embarrass- 
ments which have a est of m Se Gian h your our Lord- 
"Paap DERICK OAKEL 
resi 
The case acco 
I ng’ o ees dis whe 
Advocate and Dr. Bayfo rd opened the ease on behalf 
bra boar wes of London, stating | at great length the fact: 
tion eley’s licence, 
cam 
ma to gt Bishop in referenee to the case 
friend, Mr. Ward. No counsel appeared on perdi 
Mr. Gakele ey. After a very long _ ent, showing 
Spore ley assen octrines of the 
me, the o e s roa referred to the 
h Mr. Oakeley had a 
that Mr. 
h And 91 fth 
ad since that aar aedi 
reconcile 
ent gie those of Rom of 
Dupin, ina chisean with Archbishop Wake, but 
r.J. Graham, that all objections 
shat the amendment for reference toa 
i } h 
1825. Itis ran 1 
Capel, iat no one looking wi 50 degrees of | with part other si ted the testimonies of all 
a agi it. At 100 lock i it i is a few ‘degrees the y. hops rs Can ter sone ury ig the oe = 
a at oka h, and at midnight is due north, having an | two, re and Sheldon), for 200 ya E to rya 
altitude of: ahont 8 degrees,— l. Souk repugnance of the doctrines of the English chure! 
d Si The Rev. W. of pace and coneluded by as that ee aa re 
Russell, Inspector of ers has made by | Mr. hot Bak if adopted, would take 
Si t from the Chur 
1 
2 
H 
1 of i Newgate Tie: states that the 
P 
J 
Sir H. Jenner Fust „Sid, te must take time to con- 
A 
sell’s inspection. That ns chaplain 
endm 
other members, the Subject pak: 
ered Sree committed o onday week.— 
ing Bill Wak ricer after 
co Salie Subey discussion. 
taking off the restri 
ey on the e mortgage 
states most anran that he did not address 
e ded to his 
his regret that be had to determine this case without 
an argument on behalf of a party pro- 
ceeded against, whi ch was the mor e to be lamented as 
i The 
Mr. Oal akeley were general ; and if the act 
Elizabeth (13 reer c. 12) were or ecient 
emt have as n Mr. aka in a 
to = hi = 
t of Fiets respecting a 
= 
’ This A ip n, after a brief dikali. 
a division, and the report of the Bill 
eat deal of Railway business had been 
s Bill was on the motion of Lord ASHLEY 
EEL 
mp 
; tran: fe 
Tread a ted, the Lunatic 
and ordered to 
ie a first tim 
soner Connor. He case in the course of 
sermon, but not in the manner which had b 
tated in the publ p pi 49 
or 50 visitors were: present, of whom six or seven 
were ladies. The visitors were admitted by — 
signed by one of the sheriffs, ion one of the und der 
sheriff, by one of the visiting magistra for the mo Te 
nd ordinar 
nc wey 
form of proceeding ny “Court said, the question | a 
kg 
(aa eed F rad 
whether the doctrines he | ha 
a ira fi 
form. He 
En visito 
rious 
prit, an holya 
reports of f such scenes. 
f, 
Sarno of be effec 
tes his opinion that the practice of admit- 
rs oo ae condemned sermon is eanit inju- 
to the visitors, to the ORTE f the far ihe 
bl ef 
h + 
er the anction of — of the sheriffs. but merely wi 
states mri * distinetl ly that, with the Coogee of the published wore (or. wene mi © pug 
priso n and police; authorities already meni tioned, and Chureh of Eng gland ; and this question would neces- 
y DO visitor whatever was admitt tted into the inte- | in; judgm 
press of the prison to witness the TERE of Hocker. Phe Cas Cou v Mr. AEE the Court ot of Queen’s 
ussell, after stating some other details, submits} Bench, on Tuesday, gT e Ward brought 
the a which his ing e led him to| under ee Mr. Ward bs ving previously ob- 
n 
g nl 
show “cause why a mandamus should not issue, com- 
g them to lesen Mr. Ward to his academical 
degrees, from which he has been removed under ows 
Indeed, 
n retained to show cause 
ARTA ES 
ts, and he fi ears that 
„Bu ut, i if it be ite proper t zt] 
3 
ad bee: 
nst the men preze that, as it seemed very un- 
iy that the Court would decide om — rigor 4 
“pee ere 
period general — 
Ba ped the collective representatio 
ced their 
ne 0 i 
i effectual fle 
Thelatest accounts received | nee 
3 | prisoners and the m authorities 
at it.” Russe 
dere 
mair fall pag tho 
be as private as possible, 
d be vaara e | 
Mr. ll also strongly eima to the pejs 
the 
writ pi Sias in i i A whole facts of ~~ 
case mig ght be stated upon n the return, and that. t mate " 
ith Pear 
intended effect. 
aid, the Spanish 
