224 THE NEWSPAPER. 
7 ela Da and | persons to have in their possession pass- ords, = r other poops nia her upon the ocean. He considered it iLa- oS 
his is family ; gii rte, wher Go Aiolos E the waste land w aan of unlawful societies, without being ablet to account for the z n.— f sion between the two countries, if the, pened to lead to a colti. 
enclosed, it would give support to 200,000 additional labourers sy e ATTORNEY-GENERAL for IRELAND obtained leave bal ring caution were not ag d by the officers of the acrotion and 
with their wives and families. He „wed the Bill with great | in a Bill to amend the ace regarding the criminal jurisdiction ing sa sive ge R. INGLIS admitted that Sir Peel oo 
satisfaction, and thought that it ought to be entitled, a Bill for of the 2: assistant barrister: othe KEPE er $ ines nog tole, g a Bost essful answer tot the nimadre = , upon 
the better support of tho agricultural labourers in England Tuesday. —The e House sat rom noon to ¢ o'clock in irek : pe Palmerston on this treaty ns of 
and ee L:xconn observed, that Mr. Hume | on the Commons Enclosu tion and clauses down to 69, inclu- | which hi s Lordship hay in 
alone was tu the principle of bom Bill, and if| sive, were agreed to.— an hour’s respite, the House re- been well sustained, and had not foes 
h 
he jit k ilway ivate Bills were | that the ni ic 
2 ght to object to Seer sumed its sittings, and aos weston and private Bills were | that the ninth article of the trea 
bi oben ery Red ‘nothi ng obeetio nable in the | forwarded.—Mr. WARBURTON pre a petition from Mr. C. manner ca able of prote i w 
ciple of this Bill which was not equally” objectionable Berkeley, prayin g the House to lo Gts onare to atte end as Palmerston, and therefore he could not refrain frorn 
Eat of every private enclosure Bill ever passed. It did | witnesses in the case in which he is sued by Mes ssts. Scott. | his regret that the name of Sir R. Peel was subs 
not infringe on the rights of the poor ; on the anes: it pro- | The prayer of the petitioner was grante oe PALMERSTON | had been said that the House could n 
vided more fully than had ever been done by private legislation | moved for = Eger of the names and “scription of z eA wit- | a discussion on so small a motion; 
for the preservation of every right which could possibly exist. nesses examined before the mixed British and French commis- | motion like the present Lord Pal 
- : > i e 
property h sio rem e e he 
Galante: Dear and why? Because pied had hitherto | the sare trade: an nd of copie tracts of the eviaanes giv en respect to slavery in every part of the world, He 
use by th te 
sse: the 
Aa cbnnended thar haa tt rhe f searcÌ noA OEI ae eTo @ 6 n 
dopted, the claims of the and phere ed that had the right of search conventions o: under the pretence of enco eae 
would be investigated at a veey healt expense. It would rips and 1833 been maintained, and had not Spain, and Portugal, West Indian colonies. He understood that the lib 
reduce the expense of enclosure Bills to one-tenth of their pre- | and Brazil, + eget eee A andalous aly, ay Ei shonourably = no =! = —- a stone-yard at Sierra Leone, 
sent amount; for all the enclosures which the Commissioners Meme g 4 their engagements, ‘alae ery ld be at an e there left n to the solicitations of emigra 
recommended would be contained in their annual rt, and | end. onde: re ‘the treaty wast conctuded 7 vith France, he Trini dad, aaen ma: p other colonies, 
would be incorporated in one general public Bill. If the Com- | as penri n An ual right of sear ch be- | wasa gemend for labour. 
missioners infringed any rights of property in their report, | tween the without substituting anything | put to su 
Ae would have the power of noticing erpii for "accompli shing the purp which England icy 
e i z 
divided on Mr. ther Fre: ach, e to guard | liberated n i 
—Ayes, 11 ; noes, 121. ee bye soron iy negatived, and the | the West coast of Africa. The Right o of Goatck 5 is E nah more | the facts of. Sir R. Tngli is, a 
yeso i the remainder of the | extensive. It extended to the West Indies, the Brazils, to ra fr 
evening was consumed in A eer the e pots clauses in the | Africa, and a certain limit round the Isle of er Sara The 
bill. On arriving at the 33d clause, the Chairman was directed | present arrangement was confined to Bg West of Africa ; ; and 
to report progress and to ask leave to sit again. The Foreign | even in respect to this it would effe H ve, unless the 
p ennag oar was read a third time and passed.—The Turnpike —— and French gee to Beals together” "ike Sisiese 
Ta n — hone ee Public Works | twins, and hunted in couples. a rd Palmer: vehemently 
Geland) Bill passed thi rough co oe of the | condemne Sanat ordin: eo of the preamble. The penne of the 
Earl of Lixcotn, leave was give res te erie mpower | treaty stated that, ‘‘ Whereas the Gusen of G Soe! Te in ae 
the Commissioners of Woods pt Forests to. appropriate sg = King of the French, conbidering ¢ that the conventio: 
area of Darby-court, in the parish of St. James’s, Westminster, | 20th Nov., pated fs the En March, 1833, have “effected | their 
er baildinj purposes.—On the motion of Mr. Bou Aiai Teave a in preventing the of the English and French flags 
was give rrinin menw rosy Er my ca st on the slay trado: but findin sak liou: 
ne rdered to issue for Cambri ridge, traffic still exists.” Was it meant to be said, and had a British 
the our of Mr. <A Deby seine Solicitor. General Plenipotentiary put his name to a decla: Satin, that the British 
Sir R. hatte stated the course he means to purs tive to rv one had ot kase = ee ? Itwasa in E 
the numerous Bills brought in by Government aa | still before | on this country was astonished that a 
se T intro 
ul “arene hisa a o to R z ios 5 wn 
ning with railway measures, the Pereri said that before the | tation which it threw upon the aga Par ninth article 
end of the week Sir G. Clerk would la n the table a minute of | said that the slave-trade should be put end to in the s a 
the Board of Trade, suggesting an eration in the functions oa. Could any one read that article and Aai that the | inti 
exercised by that Board on railway matters during the present trade did not exist in the British colon What other | 51 voted for the inst 
i i abe vas in t e Bri- | brought up the report cn oe. colleges elad Bi —Mr, 
the Soya of railways be laid before them, and they will re- | tish aamen iis San Bement ior iek s iy Rea oe re- | proposed a resolution for he oondition the new Colleges to the Uni 
r publi: i 7 
d Mr. 
f n th tha ry fi e u 
Neanaeetiy infli y the passing of such Bills ; but the ae Crown to interposat 2 The nable lord Waving aasortedt “that, — a few remarks from Sir 
Board of be will be relieved from the duty of deciding on | in this well as in all other parts of their foreign policy, the solution was negatived. The oe wae then agreed to, 
their comparative merit. The right hon. baronet announced Governinant t had exhibited pai ek or assumed a low tone, the Bill was ordered to be kie a third time on Thur: sday.— 
that Sir F. Smith, Professor Barlow, and Professor Airy, had = he was not es ceed to move any resolution condemnatory Field Gar nio s Bill bf ade eet a third time and 
been appointed to consider and give their opinion upon the f their conduct, because he knew he would be left in a mino- ednesday.—T d 
question of uniformity of gauge. Sir R, Peel, having disposed a but was determined. = pren ae the Snor ii required, 
he e 
te: he 
pose of considering D aseisti 
of the railway measures, said that he was. resolved a proceed ih wing. as he did that eviden t to prove the neces- | Pauper Lunatics Bill, whi: a De 
with the Irish Colleges Bill, giving it préeedenc every- a right of searc! as os setats ae effectua ee rushing 
thing else, Then he ihtended to go on with the: Poa Law see .—Sir R. ont png Lord Palsaieiton with 
Amendment (Scotland) Bill, then Jewis i ill, aoe chat g brought forward a resolution, instead of. merely 
then a great number of English and Irish Bills to which there param for papers The fear of being left: in rise UBS Ngee 
is no opposition. The measures which he said he was obliged | not a motive that would deter men who ha Ss ong feelin 
to postpone were the Physic and Surgery Bill, the Justices’ | any subject from os th mi rt par: = a 
Clerks Bill, Clerks of Petty Sessions Bill, Parochial Settle- | plying to the multifarious topics introduce 7 Lord Palmer- 
ment Bill, ‘Mere! Finn Pi Fund Bill, and the Charitable | ston in his speech, Sir R. Peel, came to the immediate question 
Bill, &c. He hoped, he said, to carry the Commons | of th è late ee He said :— ave no apology. on the 
Enclosure Bill, devoting to it the morning sittings. Re- | pa overnment to offer for this convention. T believe 
specting the Landlord and Tenants Bill, he gave an evasive that it was ie eona measure. I i that it is ' calculat ed 
answer. A Bill to consolidate the existing Customs Acts is yet | to produc cordial and efficacious co-operation on the 
to be introduced. Touching the Irish Registration of Voters | part of Fintice. bi put down the slave-trade than would have 
and Municipal Amendment Bills, the Premier said he was | taken place under our former treaties. The noble lord has 
not to blame for not having bro Hen ght = = rward this session, | adverted to the refusal of France to ratify the treaty of 1841. 
having had so many m rtan asures to carry.— | But is he under the opinion that the refusal to ratify that treaty 
eee). Rossarı said be would hays tie d with the Eccle- | after it was signed on the part of France was a case of war ? 
siastical Courts Bill if Sir R. Peel would have given up a suffi | The noble lord has expressed no such opinion. He says that, 
cient number of Government days; but as he would not, it ap- | after the refusal on the PA cat F oe to ratify the treaty, we 
peared to him that no good purpose would be answered by | Submitted. Now that is Ia — with the ar 
i i d readi: the | lord that the Fefasal to ratify oe tresty was an unprece sete 
€ $ Surgeo: act, but I ais agree that, although an unprecedented ook it 
the plaintiff in the on against Mr. Jasper Parrott, for | Was not a case to provoke warfare between the two c 
evidence given before ‘the select committee on the Medical | But ‘the REN why the treaty was not ratified was that the 
ill, was called to the bar and examined. He said that Executive Government, karvi by the poj n opinion and 
h io 
im mbly in Fra h 
1 le p tied tele oars s anything i in the 
he believed maliciously false. He had lost in consequence all | preamble of the treaty disgraceful to this country. In his own | pretext for the injustice aH 
his business ; but could not say how far he had suffered > aaa om a zaai K yir moma m had committed precisely | the safety of = aan ch a 
in his private artea He had endeavoured to obtain redress | the r, TOT, go ich he eaea Ministers | were either i moted “by t 
both from the of guardians at Totness and from the Poor with having idee ted i in che convention of 1845, as he proved iise ac, and which shut 
Law Commissioners in London; but ineffectually.. He had | by reading its preamble. He also defended the ninth article Andre 
therefore brought this action for words en before the Com- | of the treat; from the attack which had been made upon it, 
e House. He w guilty e municipa alli of their respectiv 
he had them; and if he had done so he had dubs it Sountibes: but also against a — engagement made between 
unintentionally. He was now aware tbat he had been guilty of the two countries. The provisions a So be vention of ee 
a breach of p vilege, and was willing to let the House take such applying to a line of i a nine 10 to 16 ae egree: of 
steps as it might think fitting for the protection of his character. | south latitude, were a that account cozraphically superior “a 
He was sharp! = s-examined, for the purpose of extracting | those of the previous ‘convent ion Ftot sc 
Universit y ch o 
be founded; diminish the pupil 
o onsideration versities; and ae rd gae nen 
im an admission that the action was brought solely upon added cone pees t they would be carr: ‘ea into effect with t th i “ dominies”—fi hairs 
the words spoken before the committee ; and the declarati: cordial c m of France, he thought that there could be | art, Black, Leslie, a Sa Pla, ayfai 
was put into his hands for that purpose. The witness, how- little ärahi fire ioe had now a more powerful instrument for | tests in sod —— Seog 
ever, or Boe ago ignorant of the legal effect | the suppression of the slave-trade than we had under the de- i them sar zi x 
of the declaration whi as admitted had been read over | fective convention of Lord Palmerston. He then proceeded to | cow = 
—A very long an d desultory discussion respecting | state, that in withholding the evidence for whi is lordshi 
the course to be adopted for the vindication of the pri- | had moved, he did not withhold it because it proved the im- 
vileges of the House ensued, of which it would be useless to | portance of the right of search, but bee the evidence of 
attempt a summary ; and at t last Mr. Phil lips oS attorneys, | the eight officers (five English and three French), examined 
Mr. Charles —— rds, of Totness, — Mr. T mas Baker, of before the mixed commission, referred to matte hich it 
having severally de a rene conten might not be consistent with the interests of the public service 
= to take no farther as iake of the action, | to publish. He was, e compelled to mee to the 
— eustod ipiri wd ai DORON Tof Sera RAHAM, | answer which he had give: a former occasion to the noble 
the E House then went into pe Aa ee on the Nene mt ( pann lord, and to refuse the pabaseation of this evidence. lu- 
pe Po rater lith iene Sir T. D. AceAmb moved th sion Sir R. Peel called upon the House to bear in mind that 
of this —** Provided a , that any person herr ti this treaty had been signed by the Duke de Broglie and Dr 
ie De p r member of the governing | Lushington—men standing high for talent, integrity d 
ters upo anity, and distinguished throughout their lives for their 
d subscribe the follow- | persevering and vigorous efforts to comba n trol 
sincerely decla: his abó ble crime of dealing in the blood and sinews 
riptures of the Old | of our unfortunate fellow-cre: er se o ge 
of Almighty ome had signed this treaty, which n ration e 
- MANNERS su orid would have induced them to sign, iad they "not ‘been con- bes S 
Sir J. GRAHAM, Sir | vinced that they were placing in the hands of their espective rs Si n G 
m expressed regret at Governments the most perem instrument for the suppres- d reading euri 
a motion proposed by an hon. member of the slave-trade.—Mr. SuEm thought that instead of rineipie, Fad 0 thelr app ose 
so high a respect and regard. The com- arate comparisons betwen the merits of the conventions of | thou: ‘as ee inten e of the coun 
gainst it, 105 ; 1831 and of 1845, and of passing eulogiums on the public ser- 
jection of the clause | vices of Dr. a and ne ne de Broglie, it would have 
committee For the ter 100; hreg om k ee = R. Peel er ed Lord Palmerston’s asser- 
ail , With some a a e evidence sin y the ie officers before 
ible of the Bill, were agreed to.—Sir | mix commission ea d this point—that the right of 
to bring in a Bill to amend the | search was i Sable to the suppression SE otte slave-trade. 
ctor two Ireland, | He me en esi into Donea Ee > the details of the 
years | present convention, an whi ism, 
iE at cinse foe} iei Drica & eae aeea doug, Smi rieh ne duseaticalteg had falien into disuse 
