_THE NEWSPAPER. 
t to e during the 
of Leng hg oo og Sok. propose to repor rt p< evi- 
| dex sioa before them to the House. 
mend ar a Tigo whee will pree the Bas “from | cal 
ram- 
That in the 
i by Parliament, and the terms on 
Company are to become = perpetual 
pet Henry Bruce, presented to this House o 
y, by me = of} the ath instant, “ed gh ag to this committee, are 
ded t th t contains 35 names sub- 
the 
ond petition, present 
of August, 3e pae ns, whose 
aa d to, have recagnd 
denied the alsin made ag: ainst them, and hav 
e House. think fit to direct an investi 
enry Bru 
-3 
TA 
Waller, rng «a Who would have been cine bd to all | 
eae prop: e Mrs 
n | since e referred the ma m er t th 
ted to this 
discussed and d arranged. The di 
regret that a “successful result has not att 
com: ee in the e ng session ort the ofa 
ng ireet 
trust a the patna of their cai se will insure S 
voura able resu lt. With re spect to th 1e new lines, 
Winchester. i Due the bg ot Jast week, that 
fhe same may be made without delay ; : but the fullest 
i; 
Basingstoke to Salisbury, from the Salisbury bes anei 
at Romsey to the Southampton and Dorchester line 
anch t 2nsi x 
Orn 
i to th renin o of by $ on meen of frehaagy, 
branch of the subject, soas 
se last-named i ot an imme 
ing themselves from 
i 
owed to Sy ce orane ce on noes subject, „but 
t appea 
u 
ar ompany held 
half-yearly meeting last w eck. The report exhibited 
of t 
£1 
t 
a 1 +} 
the corres esponding 1 i 
1 Nap tae 
t been as 
rties are p a inserted, to the number 
ai ort then proceeds to state, f that 
wiide 
have oon mondo in the company s fax es and rates; 
ortho. names oF "he 
13. 
of 
the opposers of the 
consolidated stock, and 17s. on the 321. new shares, fre 
The ehairman Me. Glyn, in as add 
list comprises the names of 20.sub- 
The committee cannot conclude without 
expressing theix disapprobation n of the has asty a and in 
called attention to what had just taken place in Parlia 
ment. Their Bedford, Dunstable, rajar pee ' 
Trent Valley Bills had ree eive d the yal assent, i 
the by the jection of th 
forward against parties who appear, in several case ae 
the admission of the o; opposers of the bill themselves, andi in 
Tri ping line, ttribute 
E 
time enco de a of competition. Th 
t for the purpose of promoting } 
in their opponents ine, but to thei r harag for th 
raged $ ihe i 
R] 
iheir pet on ‘Sect, to the following ‘effect : = 
14 
defence of rai on they p 
were classed un 
“applied to pers 
e tot a general ington, Pip 
y the deposits fo: 
spons 
nsible, Previ — oo the 
1 f all 
nder two heads. 
ons who were | one from 
fe at tione names ak pleas 
msuing year a line “from Watford through 
to Luton; one from Northampton to Ban 
Coventry to Nuneaton, which would co 
the Trent Valley line ; and an extensive one, 
ct. arwickshire and ea hamshire, from Hamp 
through Warwick, Leamington, Banbury, 
- | Brackly, ae Missenden, t to join their line between | 
row and d. Arrangements had also been m 
irmingham Can al | Com an 
"ne the Birmingham a we r a direct 
sed Birmingham to to Wolverhampton by whi 
into his ie petiti tion, but said he had been 
a the advice given to = tan by his soli- 
e List of 
“Hitt, Fawcett, & Brit, in the Tines onii of this ae 
ee a a eer ao 
The committee proceeded to inquire 
they had lost the South Senet line, = oy 
+h cm 
me of t 
mares ie inoompainepa 
ns given 
of 
ous of "the init of certain ae to pay 
d subscr ibed their names, 
C 
of the ae of ~ 
charges were not sustained. They also 
Sn like bn just kernan to were ‘ado ‘he 
pte gat? Ss the utmost i onest shat pus flow ff 
pt ystem. _He also t took oce ent, and 19 aa 
cident. 
— terms the assertion bd Lord P: 
‘of witnesses and the non-attendance of sacha The 
in inthe House of Commons, that eng oe ever 
n their line'for the purpose of propelling 
A ft 
5 ee eS harg 
8 
Eggs 
FA 
ecco 
ee 
oF 
oat 
S 
=. 
HE 
E 
ssal e 
E 
ʻ 
bi 
p3 
SEs 
PEDE 
Eis 
e 
oo moooo o 
= 
[sE 
|è 
& 
& 
pa 
Ca 
SEN 
© 
ou 
si 
LS 
£8 
Se 
ad 
-à 
3 
eseuse 
eE 
4 
of the South Western Company was held 
E 
è 
èg 
allegation of fraud, &e. “The pach ors the hen 
fore 
tood. be » they | pe 
ere of i ion that < Me. Bruce | na suse a the right 
m arges agai ains st 
stated. I geant were au 
e 
es } ton rp : 
for the meeting ee a vn 
r share less income-tax ; to _ e 
Fowo s nd H aling RAY 3 to 
5 
em |s 
LEES 
© Con 
Š 
Salle E DEEN SSN ST Cael 
gressive im 
— fa "igs. lld. out of whic 
zrs 
zee 
a = 
Sgeses | snee 
s 
we 
2: 
“ah ep 
discussion on the propriety of a further reduction of 
fares. The directors in thi 
rg Wih MOREE 
mg ey 
to | t 
It was stated. as a singular fact, 
ue ‘onsols d . the Jast few y' 
~~. d on — aid by co, togeth 
pf. perrong he i next a Brighton and Chi 
rstood, the F naan tonw pa m 
peike aes Haig that.| effecti ue 
were of an exceedi creation of 12,320:shares, of 502. ope Eastern 
created no little a pecial meeting of the comet * presi 
It ears that. the claim. in disp ai 
ks and subscrib thatand re Brighton Company yt tho const 
pari lthough-not | the six miles of railway west of pA 
ible for the | company, has,,at last, by mutual T ee 
e half- ‘easly. meet- |justed ; and with that der it peo 
at Nine | arrangement for the transfer of powers, 
given t Brighton. ompany, 
yementin the traffic, the available et pd ton to join the Brighton, Lewes, s 
h the directors. re-.| wa: South- an 
these two companies. 
y 
ith 
| meet thiselaim was sri ra now. 
Brighton — 
i ands. 
a favonable in- o 
extension, had been lost n rere 
