



- 





A.1 



— — _^_= ' 



* * 25 ^ 



""ai.s a, — 





A 





GOODYEAR FTB 



/ A 9 



- /^ 



A ^CERC DATA: a- 

 THIS STUDY, H / L « 0.04'- - 



I 



Dt 

 (cm) 



d W D/ d W/ d/ 



(cm) (cm) U L 



64 



200 1280 .30 21 .04-. 21 



51-120 100-580 .06-23 21 .04-1.5 



i 



1 



1 2 3 



Ratio of Wavelength-to-Breakwater Width, L/W 

 a. 



3 A 25 



- 2 - 5 ""o-C 





7 °4.5 



05 

 06 





At-5 Q 3.5. 



■-=-8 3- 



Z.5 



,t5 



^2.5 



.1.5 «, 



CFRC DATA:o 



A. 





GOODYEAR 



FTB 







Dt 

 cm) 



d w 



(cm) (cm) 



X 



% 



\ 



64 



400 850 



.15 



14 



.12-.34 



64 



400 1280 



.15 



21 



.08-34 



Hi 



THIS STUDY, n 4_«0.04 



8.4,15 3H20 100- 380 .06-23 21 .04-15 



12 3 4 



Ratio of Wavelength-to-Breakwater Width, L/W 



b. 



Comparison of prototype-scale and model-scale transmission coeffi- 

 cients, C t , as a function of relative breakwater width, L/W, 

 for the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company scrap-tire floating 

 breakwater (after Harms and Bender, 1978). 



133 



