

1.0- 























0.9 - 





□ 



















0.8 - 







□ 

















0.7 - 







+ i 



pi 



V _ 













o 

 u 



0.6 - 







+ 













z 

 o 



0.5 - 









+ 







LEGEND 





z 

 < 



z. 



0.4 - 















D OBSERVED K, 

 + PREDICTED K t 







0.3 





















0.2 - 























0.1 - 























- 



\ 



T" 



















RELATIVE FREEBOARD, F/H,,,,, 



Figure 23. Comparison of data and predicted values of the wave trans- 

 mission coefficient using the transmission model for subsets 9 and 10 



2.0 - 







a 















1.9 - 





















1.8 - 





















1.7 





















1.6 - 



P 













O OBSERVED DATA 







2 1.5 ~ 



Q 





















1 14 " 







b 

















i 1.3 - 



z 

 < 





c 



1 















jE 1.2 - 







D 















1.1 - 



D 







Dryf 





& 



m 



(P^m 



n„ n 



-, n 





1.0 



B 



P u m ' 



a cPlr n 



m 



□ 



£ 



a 



D 



D 





0.9 - 









D 













0.8 - 







□ a 



D 



D 













0.7 - 

























RELATIVE FREEBOARD. F/H 



Figure 24. Ratio of the transmitted period of peak energy density to 

 the incident period of peak energy density as a function of the rela- 

 tive freeboard, all subsets 



35 



