



Symbol 



Motion 

 and Load Condition 



No. of Measurements on 

 Which c.d.f. is Based 



Method Confidence Band* Based 

 gf on Kolmogorov's Statistic 

 SamDlini '' ' Probability Level of 0.95 

 6„,0.95«1.3581N-''^ 





o 

 • 



Pitch Ace, Ballast 

 Pitch Ace, Load 



1575 

 1578 



2 min 

 every 4th 

 hr 



± 3.42 percent 

 ± 3.42 percent 





•Th» unknown distribution (fot the load condition) is enpectod to lie within the plotted confidence 

 bind i( it is assumed that the Masured data were random and independent samples. 





U.Ul 



o.os 





'. . .i^ 



;::• 





.,... 





::: 









;:i| 



'•i 



i 



1 



t t 



|l 





J. 



L'iir 















-j-T-; ■ 













:;!l 











iil^ 



1 1 

 11 



1 



! -i 



1 1 ' 



■^^ 



H 



tii 





































Load Condition — i^^^ 



-^ 





/ 



/; 







































■ ■ t 





:;:: 



■'* 





■^^ 



J 







;;■; 



T! 



:: 









,1, 



























■ !■ 





^ 



: i i 



I' 'I 



h 



i 



^ 





1:: 











::!: 





1 

 2 



5 





































^ 



f 



lal 



ast 



Condition \ 



,,,,, ,,., 



- 





' i ' • 





'h 





... 









■J 









; / 

 / 











til 



10 







.:;■ 

















;:;i 







. ,// 









ll 











'■V.'. 











; 1 i i 







.; 









':'.• 











:\\]^ 



\ 



Confidence Band (Load Condition) 



';:' 



20 



31) 

 40 

 SO 

 60 

 70 



BO 





; !:l 

























i2^^^ 





V 



or a Probability Level of 0.95 ^ 



- i : : 



^ 



w 



;: , 

















. . 



i 



^ 





( 



Base 



a on 



KO 



mogo 



ovs 



blal 



ISII 



) 







4 



•111 



















■0 



1 



1; . ; 





























I'U 



;!i! 















/ 



^^ 































i'l! 



-i 1 



ii!l 







1'!! i! 





1). 



f 



r 













;;j; 







::i: 















■Hf 















/ 



f 



r 



















;''i 



i 



::i: 







■y. 







Mil 



ii- 



:;:i 











y^ 



7 











• ■ ■ 1 







:■!; 





•li- 



iiii 









,i;| 



i'i: 

 till 







!- 



■ ■ 







'-\ 



>;J 



. - 





_L 



















;i;. 













iilt 



BO 

 9S. 

 411 



;-"--^ : : 



Ml; 





:■ 1 







i 



f 







jili 





.... 















:'!; 











/ 





i 



ri 







■i; 



.;. 



'■■! 



'. '. \ '. 



■iii; 









;,J 



;ji; 



iih 









1 



•lii 



-J- l 



-i 1 - 



■-r: 



^y 



/ 





... 









■ ". 













M: 



il 1 



■ 



itf 





z 





:; 











-r-Hl 



..--iJ 

 l- i 



't 



u 



f 



I 













i'i: 







\'.\\ 







i'|: 













llil 



iT 





99 



".:: 





:^Hr 



T- 



illi 



■k 





\ 



::. 













;::i 





M 





i-;; 



'11 







■■•\ 







liii 



il 



::.: 





_._4_-i. 



;r:_ 



i 



■]! 







...t 



''i 









;:;: 



■■■l 



1 ' 1 1 



rb; 





ij'i 













Ml! 



ftf 



1 



^ 





-l-f'-*- 



' r ll 



h 

















„. 





i i 



! ' ' 











,;;,!, 



,.i 



.,1. 





^m 



■iiz.' 



:l! 









1 





— 



■!■ 



.: : 



1 



i:: 







i 



\\\ 



' 



llii 



ijii 





:^+' 



: : ' ; 







'xl 









-i V--'- 



1 ' 



'a 



Hi; 

 ii'i 



•tii 



ilj: 



1 







' 



I 



1,1 



11, 



11 



:i- 



^;|;i 



■■.[■ 





: 



+' 





99 99 



1 ll 



,.ii.ii 



!| 



iJ 



_ 



L 



\h 



99.8 

 99.5 



Pitch AcealMadon in T«™» of "^'rjy "»"» 



Fig. 21 SS Esso Asheville — Statistical Cumulative Distribution of Pitch Acceleration 



(These distributions are based on data given in Tables 11 and 12.) 



35 



