I 3 LEVEL MARSH 1 i 

 29 AUGUf 



a s 



_ 21 



o o 



I i 



a. ^ 



5 ^ 



H=^ 





CF.BRIS LINE 



=3 



81 





n=118/B^ 





1 



r— 





' 1 f 



1 s 



sUU s 



< 



Q O O Q 



H-t OS 



Figure 6. 



Taxonomic 

 community, i 

 * = <1 percen 



'nvertebrate 



les on dates shown, 



s otherwise indicated. 



Faunal compositio:! 

 large enclosure method^ 

 forms (Figs. 7 and 8). 

 and sedge marshe*; '^^-rr, 

 larvae in the :■ 

 abundant in the 

 quently found i- 

 their quantifier. -^-.. . - 

 the submerged vegetatio 

 linids, and cocc"'-iit^ 

 hydrophilids wt 

 which are aquat^.^, ..r^, 

 mergence. These animal 

 bank habitats. Diptera w_, 

 larvae psychodids, ceratop 

 variation among mars^ °- 

 submerged marshes, 

 Delphacidae, the mo3 . 



pled by the 

 . _xrestrial 

 in the low sand 

 1 dipterous 

 e moderately 

 -y were fre- 

 ion which made 

 .... captured from 

 limnebiids, staphy- 

 '■n^irsh, carabids and 



the hydrophilids, 

 ^.i£, its rare sub- 

 nearby pan or eroded 

 arsh were primarily 

 ids, with some 

 ; abundant in the 

 lies--Cicadellidae; 



Aquatic crusta: 

 amphipods Corophiw: 

 traskianUj the isop 

 and Cimelta (Figs, 

 were especially abundaii 

 of ff. lutea swarmed in 

 vegetated areas. In th 

 amphipods migrated upsh 

 in dead eelgrass and other uebi 

 the large enclosure sampling gi 

 measured very high. 



arshes were the 

 JoluSj and Orahestia 

 cean genera, Hemileuoon 

 and A. aonferviaolus 

 Dense summer populations 

 depressions between 

 umbers of talitrid 

 ies, seeking shelter 

 :eriai floated within 

 other animal densities 



