61 



observed in using the method is given in References 71 and 101. It will be 

 seen that the magnitude of the minimum cavitation number agrees quite well 

 with the cavitation number of the cavity except for a point near the nose. 

 The low value of the pressure coefficient near the nose of the model was at- 

 tributed to inaccurate determination of cavity shape at this point. In view 



TMB 26206 



Figure 36 - Model Constructed to the Shape of the Cavity in Figure 35 



\--G> 



f < 



X Z.SSx/o' 1 



zl 3.SS k/o'" 

 9 -5". &8 X /d*" 



¥* 



*/<. 



■fe 



Figure 37 - Pressure Distribution on the Model of Figure 36 



