

— f 







1 1 



-n — 



1 1 



-p;;; m- 





1 1 1 



— 1 





















N 









84 



- 











\ 













" 

























eo 



- 













\ 





\ 







- 

















\ 





1 











' 













\ 





\ 























\ 













» 60 



- 













\ 











~ 



^ 50 

















\ 

















































\ 









,1 40 



_ 















\ 



\ 







~ 



















\ 



\ 







o. 



- 















\ 



\ 





\ 



\ 

 \ 





- 



16 



- 















\ 



\ 





- 

















> 











- 



TYPE A 











1 



1 



^- 







1,, 1, , 



1 1 



1 ' 



1 1 



1 



X, , 



1 I 









— 1 



-rr^ 



T—i 



I 1 ■ 



J T ■' 



1 T 



-n; 



— m — ' 



N 



\ 



T—I 1 



TTl— 



-T 













' 



• • 1 













80 

 ^ 60 



- 











\ 



\ 

 \ 

 \ 

 \ 





\ 

 \ 



1 

 \ 







- 



■° 50 

















\ 































20 

 16 



- 













\ 



\ 

 \ 

 \ 



A 



\ 

 \ 



\ 

 \ 





- 



- TYPE B 











V 



"v 







1 - 





1 1 1 1 1 [ J 



j_i_ 



1 1 



1 1 



1 



\i 1 



1 ' 



1 1 1 



' 











1 1 



T T "- 





-TT 





















^*>^ 







s 









- 











\ 













- 



























" 













\ 

 \ 





\ 







- 















\ 

 \ 











" 















\ 



























\ 



\ 























I 



\ 



s. 





















I 

 \ 





\ 



\ 





' 



- 















\ 





\ 





- 



- 



TYPE C 



III 1 1 1 



1 1 



1 1 



_1_1_ 





\ 



\ 



W 1 



1 ' 



1 1 1 



1 



Groin Siielmm) 



Figure 29. Comparison of fine sand from the 

 study area with sands knovm to 

 have liquefied under cyclic loading 



74 



