O 0.7 — 



1 



1 1 1 1 1 1 1 









PERFECT 



/ 





— 



AGREEMENT -.^^^^ 



/ 



— 











• 









/ 







— 



/.• 





— 



- 







- 



— 







— 



— 







— 



— • 



V 





— 



/ 









-/ 







— 



/ 1 



1 1 1 1 1 1 1 



1 





1.0 

 0.9 

 0.8 

 0.7 

 0.6 

 0.5 

 0.4 

 0.3 

 0.2 

 0.1 



01 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 

 EXPERIMENTAL TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENT 



Figure 12: Comparison between Predicted and Experimental 



Transmission Coefficients. Experiments for 



H./h = 0.1 by Keulegan (1973, Tables 4, 8, 



li and 16). Predictions based on 6 =2.7 



and R = 70. ° 



c 



1.0 



z 0.9 



o 0.8 

 u. 



lio.7 



o 



o 



2 0.6 



O 



^0.5 



UJ 



G^ 0.4 



UJ 



cr 



I- 0.2 

 u 



° I 

 UJ ^- ' 



cc 



'^ 



0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 OS 07 0.8 0.9 1.0 



EXPERIMENTAL REFLECTION COEFFICIENT 



1 1 1 



1 1 1 1 1 ^ 





1 1 1 1 1 1 y 



— 



/ - 





■ / 





■ . / 



- 



.V^ - 







■ /PERFECT — 





/ AGREEMENT 



— 



■ ■ — 



— ■ 



y 





/ 



■ 





/ 





- / 



— 



/ 





- / 



— 



/III 



1 1 1 1 1 1 



Figure 



Comparison between Predicted and Experimental 

 Reflection Coefficients. Experiments for 

 H./h = 0.1 by Keulegan (1973, Tables 4, 8, 

 iJ and 16). Predictions based on S =2.7 

 and R = 70. ° 



40 



