A. SPM Fill Factor (R„ = 3.09) 



Dean Fill Factor (R = 2.12) 





-' ' ' ' 



i . . . 





, . , , 





, , , . 



.......... 

















-S^^ffl 



, 





STABLE 









J^ggs* 

















f^^^ 





: 







"/^X^K 







: 





/ /// y / 



V/////7 1 : 



1.0 



= 





UhtNl 1 • 



// ill l\ 1 ! 



7 



. 





mmmt 



■ 













II II IstJ III 1 





- 





















1 " 



UNSTAB 



LE 

















\ 





i 



| 



• 





















I 







■ 



C. Adjusted SPM Fill Factor (R A =2. 80) D. Renourishment Factor (Rj=1.25) 



Figure 12. Comparison of fill factor techniques and renourishment method 

 for example data from Virginia Beach, Virginia. 



39 



