FITTED DISTRIBUTION 
G@——) SAMPLE DISTRIBUTION 
— — — SECOND APPROXIMATION 
+ SAMPLE EXTREMES 
¥ 
: : 
a > 
g a 
FS 3° 
g g 
: 8 
e 
0.0005 
.0001 
e -2 =1 () 1 2 3 4 5 6 
MAXIMA , STANDARD DEVIATIONS , INPUT= .500 ; OUTPUT= .668 
A 731 POINT SAMPLE FITTED TO THE 
THEORETICAL DISTRIBUTION OF MAXIMA 
EPSILON= .482 , SIGMA= 1.00 
0.9999 
—— FITTED DISTRIBUTION 
ES G—4) SAMPLE DISTRIBUTION 
— — — SECOND APPROXIMATION 
+ SAMPLE EXTREMES 
WwW 
3 
E 2 
2 
o > 
Fs | 
9° Q 
4 2 
a a 
pr) 
14 
-2 = ie) 1 2 3 4 5 
MINIMA , STANDARD DEVIATIONS , INPUT= .500 ; OUTPUT= .668 
A 727 POINT SAMPLE FITTED TO THE 
THEORETICAL DISTRIBUTION OF MAXIMA 
EPSILON= .482 , SIGMA= 1.00 
Fig. 12.18. Comparison of cumulative distribution of response maxima and 
minima estimated from the simulation, with those of the first 
(fitted distribution) and second approximation — sample 1. 
(From Dalzell.5®) 
377 
