FITTED DISTRIBUTION 
0.9995 
0.999 }@——) SAMPLE DISTRIBUTION 
— — — SECOND APPROXIMATION 
O.995F + SAMPLE EXTREMES 13 
0.99 
0.95 
0.9 +2 w 
< 
z 0.8 g 
5 6 5 
& 05 SiS 
o 04 Q 
a 0.3 3 
0.2 x 
0 
0.1 
0.05 
0.01 =I 
0.005 
0.0005 
u 1 -2 
pone -5 (0) 5 10 
MAXIMA , STANDARD DEVIATIONS , INPUT= 1.000 ; OUTPUT= 1.376 
A 736 POINT SAMPLE FITTED TO THE 
THEORETICAL DISTRIBUTION OF MAXIMA 
EPSILON= .691 , SIGMA= 1.00 
0.9999 
0.9995 + —— FITTED DISTRIBUTION 
H G—4) SAMPLE DISTRIBUTION 
— — — SECOND APPROXIMATION 
+ SAMPLE EXTREMES 
fS 
z é 
= S 
2 S 
3 3 
© S 
a a 
Ww 
x 
-4 -3 =2 -1 0 i 2 3 4 5 
MINIMA , STANDARD DEVIATIONS , INPUT= 1.000 ; OUTPUT= 1.376 
A 735 POINT SAMPLE FITTED TO THE 
THEORETICAL DISTRIBUTION OF MAXIMA 
EPSILON= .691 , SIGMA= 1.00 
Fig. 12.19. Comparison of cumulative distribution of response maxima and 
minima estimated from the simulation, with those of the first 
(fitted distribution) and second.approximation — sample 2. 
(From Dalzell.5®) 
378 
