Table 7. 



Average long-term excursion rates along 

 Wrightsville Beach. 



Profile 



Distance from 



Avg 



Avg excursion 





station 



north study 



excursion 



rate due to long- 

 shore processes^ 







boundary 



rate 







(km) 



(m/yr) 



(m/yr) 





WB12 



0.00 



-1.2 



-1.1 





WB2 



0.55 



1.7 



1.8 





WB3 



1.11 



1.3 



1.4 





WB4 



1.41 



0.6 



0.7 





WB6 



1.74 



-0.9 



-0.8 





WB7 



1.80 



-1.6 



-1.5 





WB9 



2.01 



-1.3 



-1.2 





WB11 



2.32 



-5.0 



-4.4 





WB13 



2.61 



-4.6 



-4.5 





WB15 



2.91 



-5.8 



-5.7 





WB16 



3.22 



-5.1 



-5.0 





WB17 



3.24 



-4.1 



-4.0 





WB19 



3.52 



-4.2 



-4.1 





WB21 



3.82 



-4.3 



-4.2 





WB25 



4.12 



-1.3 



-1.2 





WB29 



4.42 



-2.1 



-2.0 





WB33 



4.72 



-4.1 



-4.0 





WB36 



5.01 



-0.3 



-0.2 





WB39 



5.32 



-0.2 



-0.1 





WB42 



5.62 



-0.6 



-0.5 





WB44 



5.91 



0.0 



0.1 





WB47 



6.22 



-0.5 



-0.4 





WB49 



6.52 



-4.1 



-4.0 





WB50 2 



6.71 



-2.7 



-2.6 





^Based on a 0. 10-meter loss in excursion due to a rise in sea level, 

 ^profiles within inlet shoals. 



COMPUTED VALUES USING £ = 1500 

 COMPUTED VALUES USING $ = 900 

 COMPUTED VALUES USING 3 = 300 

 MEASURED DATA VALUES 



21 22 



DISTANCE ALONG BEACH (km) 



Figure 24. Comparison of measured and computed volumetric 

 change along Carolina Beach. 



50 



