Charleston, and Georgetown Counties), west coast of Florida (Lee County), and Matagorda 

 Peninsula and other areas (Matagorda, Brazoria, and Cameron Counties) in Texas. 

 Comparative photos ranging in date from 1939 to 1962 were used to analyze coastal 

 changes. Effects of storms and long term coastal processes on the shoreUne are illustrated 

 and described in qualitative terms. Advantages of comparative photos for studies of coastal 

 change are discussed. Changes in beaches, beach ridges, barrier islands, tidal inlets, deltas, 

 spits, shoals, and other features are described. 



6600RS0002 

 GAWNE, CONSTANCE E., "Shore Changes on Fenwick and Assateaque Islands, Maryland 

 and Virginia," Unpublished Senior Thesis, CoUege of Liberal Arts and Sciences, 

 University of Illinois, Urbana, 111., 1966. 



Keywords: Aerial Photographs, Beach Erosion, Fenwick and Assateaque Island, Maryland 

 and Virginia 



Report describes a study of tlie magnitude and rate of beach erosion along 40 miles of coast 

 on Fenwick and Assateaque Islands by use of periodic photos. Beach erosion magnitude was 

 determined by comparing ground distances computed from measurements made directly on 

 the comparative photos. Photo scale was derived from measurements on the photos and 

 small-scale topographic maps. Erosion values were measured at 4-mile intervals along the 

 coast. 



6600RS0003 

 PLUSQUELLEC, PAUL L., "Coastal Morphology and Changes of an Area Between 

 Brigantine and Beach Haven Heights, New Jersey," UnpubUshed Master of Science 

 Thesis, Department of Geology, University of lUinois, Urbana, III., 1966. 



Keywords: Aerial Photographs, Coastal Changes, New Jersey 



Thesis presents a study of changes in coastal features between Brigantine and Beach Haven 

 Heights, New Jersey, by use of photos and old USC&GS field sketches. Field sketches dating 

 back to 1840 and periodic photos dating from 1932 to 1964 were used. Planimetric maps 

 sketched from photos were compared to each other and to the field sketches and changes in 

 coastal features were noted. Photos were corrected for scale variation but not for tilt in 

 compiUng the maps. Changes were described in qualitative terms although some measure- 

 ments define the erosion and accretion of spits and other coastal features. Differences 

 between changes caused by normal wind, tide, wave, and longshore currents and by major 

 storms are stated. Net change for the area was a significant amount of erosion. 



6600RS0004 



AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY, Manual of Photogrammetry, 3rd. ed.. 



Vols. 1 and 2, American Society of Photogrammetry, Falls Church, Va., 1966, 1199 pp. 



Keywords: Photogrammetry, Aerial Photographs, Coastal Mapping 



Comprehensive text covers all aspects of photogrammetry in two volumes. Chapters on 

 optics, the photo process, stereo viewing principles, planning photogrammetry projects. 



27 



