Figure 3 — Body Plan, Cruiser Model 3 



-DWL 

 -0.75 WL 

 -O.50WL 



0.25 WL 

 Baseline 



Figure 4 — Body Plan, Cruiser Model 4 



by bow emergence, slamming, wetness, etc. would not influence the comparison of motion re- 

 sults among the several models. Thus, differences in motion characteristics can be attributed 

 to differences in underwater hull characteristics rather than to variations in flare or free-board. 

 .Ml of the model test programs included a range of wave lengths from about 75 percent to 

 1.50 percent of the model length. A range of model speeds corresponding to Froude numbers 

 from to about 0.30 was obtained for each wave condition. 



