M = 1.2 



N = I ( 1.113 )^ 64-. A = 0.001 



4.150 X 0.04,-47 1.2 



ho = 0.023 ft. 



Ho' ='^2Nho = 0.0068 ft. (measured ^ 0.003 1 .001 ft) 



cos ex e = ho_ = 0.023 = 0.957 ; ex £ = 16° - 50' 

 Ho 0.02>4 



tan oC = - cot oc £, 



CC 9 = - 73° = 10' or -1.28 radians 



= - 1.28 14.0.5 ^ 29 seconds 



Msasiired G = 34. + sec. 



Referring back to the sanB calculation on page 34- j (Laminar flow, 

 Example (a) 



8a y -= 8 X 1.05 y 10"^ = 16 



OC aHqR^ sin ex £ 0.044-7 x 123 x .0125 x (0.0152)^ x .331 



The viscous head is large as compared with the velocity head. 



Conclusions 



On the basis of the comparisons made it is believed that the 

 theoretical curves may be relied upon more than experinental results 

 because the error in the experimental results is relatively great. This 

 statement is made on the assumption that the various criteria developed 

 in the theory are satisfied. 



36 



