1486 
INCIDENT 
SHOCK 
; . 
\ 
Mat, N20 
MeO Net Wf Met, Net [Mei Net 
6.= 82.8° 8. 77.7* | @=72.1° { 8° 69.8° 
E« 38° : r | Ex Zhe —E<21° 
FIG.20 CHARGE: 0.5 Ib GAUGE DEPTH: 24.7 #1 
RANGE: 475 tt CHARGE DEPTH: 40 ft 
WATER DEPTH: 841t 
INCIDENT 
SHOCK 
Rad | 
Msi,N2Q MsO,Nel \ } 
| 
\j Mal Nei Ms2, Nel \ Mel, N=2 
@°86.0° 6+84.5° 8.80.07 @=76.7° 8. 75.3° 
£*62.5° €*45° E<35" £°325° 
Heese eee te 
ey 
FIG.2b CHARGE: 0.5 Ib GAUGE DEPTH: 24 7 fr 
RANGE: 880ft CHARGE DEPTH: 40PFrt 
WATER: DEPTH: 76 ft 
INCIDENT 
SHOCK 
j i 
SS i a 
y oR sa ty \ — 
/ \ 
Msi,N 0, Nel ‘a \ | 
Msi,NeQ  derO, N Ms2.Nel Mei, N22 M*2.N*2 Ms2,N=2 'M<3.N22 /M*2 Ne 
8x87 O*87.2 8982.5 @+82.1° : @*80.2° @:79,7° @-776° Ae 
&+75° £53" €+52* €+45 £+43° E«375° €*36° 
Oe se 
‘ 
FIG.2¢ CHARGE: 0 5 ib GAUGE: DEPTH: 24.7f1 
RANGE 1485? CHARGE DEPTH: 40ft 
WATER DEPTH: 681 
FIGURE 2 
COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL PRESSURE-TIME CURVES INCLUDING HIGHER ORDER REFLECTIONS. 
DATA: TIMING WAVE ON EXPERIMENTAL RECORDS § I10Kc 
é, c 
THEORETICAL RECORDS: ASSUMED DENSITY RATIO, "2.7 ASSUMED VELOCITY RATIO,— * hts 
' 
UNDERLINING M OR N 
Cc, 
INDICATES THAT THE FIRST REFLECTION OF THE SEQUENCE TOOK 
PLACE AT THE SURFACE OR BOTTOM,RESPECTIVELY. 
