LIST OF FIGURES (continued) 



Page 



Figure 3-23. Plot of the three stages of CLIS 94 mound development, overlaid with 



the CDA 94 buoy positions 48 



Figure 3-24. Distribution of RPD (cm) and OSI values over the CLIS 94 mound, 

 overlaid on September 1995 bathymetry and final detectable margin 

 of the mound 51 



Figure 3-25. REMOTS® photographs at Station 300S displaying the differences in 

 benthic conditions (deep RPD [A] versus low DO [B]) within the 

 confines of the same station 52 



Figure 3-26. Distribution of successional stage assemblages over the CLIS 94 



mound, overlaid on September 1995 bathymetry and final detectable 

 margin of the mound 53 



Figure 3-27. Distribution of RPD (cm) and OSI values over the FVP mound 55 



Figure 3-28. Distribution of successional stage assemblages over the FVP mound 56 



Figure 3-29. REMOTS® photographs of Stations 100N (A) and 300W (B) 



displaying differences in benthic conditions between the center and 



apron of the FVP mound 57 



Figure 4-1 . Position of the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection 

 Dissolved Oxygen Sampling Stations and bottom DO trends at 

 summer monitoring stations 23, 26, and 27 for 1994 and 1995 61 



Figure 4-2. Observed changes in bottom DO concentrations at Connecticut 



Department of Environmental Protection Dissolved Oxygen Sampling 

 Stations H2 and H4 for 1995 63 



Figure 4-3. Histogram displaying recorded RPD calculations from June 1991, 



November 1993, and September 1995 at Stations 100E, 100N, 100W, 



and CTR over the FVP mound 64 



