LIST OF FIGURES (continued) 



Page 



Figure 3-20. Mean dredged material thickness at 1995 REMOTS® sediment-profile 



photography stations over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to 

 the August 1992 detectable margins 70 



Figure 3-21 . REMOTS® photographs of Station 200S depicting a layer of pebble and 



shell over reworked dredged material 71 



Figure 3-22. Spatial distribution of mean redox potential discontinuity depths over the 

 NL-91 and D/S mound complex as detected by the 1995 REMOTS® 

 sediment-profile photography survey, relative to the 1992 detectable 

 margins of the mound 73 



Figure 3-23. REMOTS photographs showing Stage II on Stage III at (A) CTR and 



Stage I on III at (B) 200N on the D/S Mound 74 



Figure 3-24. Spatial distribution map of successional stage status for the August 1995 

 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations occupied over the 

 NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the detectable margins of the 

 mound 75 



Figure 3-25. 1997 REMOTS® images from Stations 200E (A) and 200W (B) depicting 

 dredged material layering and medium-grained sand in the surface layer, 

 respectively 78 



Figure 3-26. 1997 REMOTS® images collected at the NL-91 and D/S mound complex 

 Stations 100S (A) and 200S (B) displaying a surface layer of pebbles over 

 reworked dredged material 79 



Figure 3-27. Distribution map of mean RPD (red) and median OSI (blue) values 



calculated for the 1997 survey over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, 

 relative to the 1992 disposal mound footprint 80 



Figure 3-28. Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1997 survey over 

 the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the 1992 disposal mound 

 footprint 81 



Figure 3-29. Evidence of recently disposed capping dredged material (CDM) over the 



NL-91 and D/S mound complex 83 



