LIST OF FIGURES (continued) 



Page 



Figure 3-30. CDM disposal locations and projected footprint of new dredged material 

 on the seafloor vs. depth of new material at REMOTS® stations over the 

 NL-91 and D/S mound complex 84 



Figure 3-31. REMOTS® photograph of Station 200S depicting a layer of pebble and 



shell over reworked dredged material 87 



Figure 3-32. Distribution map of mean RPD (red) and median OSI (blue) values 



calculated for the 1998 survey over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, 

 relative to the 1992 disposal mound footprint and the predicted footprint of 

 new material deposited during the 1997-98 disposal season 88 



Figure 3-33. Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1998 survey over 

 the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the 1992 disposal mound 

 footprint and the predicted footprint of new material deposited during the 

 1997-98 disposal season 89 



Figure 3-34. Bathymetric chart of the 1600 m x 1600 m survey area, August 1995 



results, 0.5 m contour interval 91 



Figure 3-35. Depth difference plot displaying the location of the disposal mounds 

 created since the August 1992 survey (USCGA, NL-94, and NL-92) 

 relative to historic disposal mounds 92 



Figure 3-36. USCGA mound, depth difference from August 1992 to August 1995, 



0.2 m contour interval 93 



Figure 3-37. Distribution map of mean RPD and median OSI values calculated for 



the 1995 survey over the USCGA Mound 96 



Figure 3-38. Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1995 survey 



over the USCGA Mound 97 



Figure 3-39. NL-94 mound, depth difference from August 1992 to August 1995, 



0.2 m contour interval 99 



Figure 3-40. REMOTS® images obtained from NL-94 Station 150NW (A) and 1 

 50SE (B) depicting ambient sediment and reworked historic dredged 

 material, respectively 102 



