LIST OF FIGURES (continued) 



Page 



Figure 3-8 . REMOTS® photographs collected over Stations 1 OOW (A) and 1 OON (B) 

 displaying the difference between mature/decaying amphipod tubes at the 

 sediment-water interface versus a growing juvenile population 26 



Figure 3-9. Hillshaded bathymetry of the 1000 x 1000 m Seawolf Mound survey 



area, August 2000 29 



Figure 3-10. Depth difference comparison between the August 2000 and July 1998 



1000 X 1000 mbathymetric surveys of the Seawolf 30 



Figure 3-11. Map showing the distribution of dredged material at the Seawolf Mound as 



detected in the August 2000 REMOTS® survey 31 



Figure 3-12. REMOTS® sediment-profile photographs collected at Stations 75 WSW (A) 

 displaying a thin layer of fine sand over homogeneous gray clay, indicative of 

 Seawolf CDM; and 450N (B) displaying ambient sediments (fine sand over 

 silt/clay matrix) 32 



Figure 3-13. REMOTS® sediment-profile photographs displaying armoring deposits of 



shell (A) and pebbles (B) at Seawolf Stations CTR and 300SE 34 



Figure 3-14. Map of replicate-averaged RPD depths and median OSI values calculated for 

 the REMOTS® stations occupied over the Seawolf Mound 35 



Figure 3-15. Map of successional stage assemblages detected at the REMOTS® stations 



occupied over the Seawolf Mound 36 



Figure 3-16. REMOTS® images obtained over the Seawolf Mound displaying the different 

 types of surface tubes constructed by individuals of advanced successional 

 stages 37 



Figure 3-17. Map of replicate-averaged RPD depths and median OSI values calculated for 

 the stations occupied over the USCGA Moimd 40 



Figure 3-1 8. Map of successional stage assemblages detected at the REMOTS® stations 



occupied over the USCGA Mound 41 



