

2.6 





2.4 





2.2 



e 



2.0 



> 

 O 



> 

 o 



1.8 

 1.6 

 1 .4 



rt 





> 

 -1 



1.2 

 1.0 



0) 



0.8 



5. 



0.6 



(0 



<i> 



Q. 



0.4 





0.2 





0.0 



- 













- 





la 



□ 









Linear Fit ^ 





B 



B B ■ 







^. 



B 



B 



= 



D 



■ B 







■ 



■B 



B 



■ B IB 







r B 



■ 



B B 



-— __ O B B ■ 









El 



B 



■ '- B — _ 

 B B 13 



- -^ _ 











= B 



a 





K Nauset Beach 







IZl 







[J M'squanicut 

 r Westhampton 







B 





~ 



n Jones Beach 

 ■ Long Beach Is. 













■ Atlantic City 

 B Ludlar- Beach 













1 1 



1 





1 1 





-35 -25 -15 -5 5 



Median Volume Change above NGVD, mVm 

 Figure 18. Variation between median volume change and the peak water level 



Volume above NGVD vs Wave 





/ .u - 

 6.0 - 







B 



Q 





B 









5.0 - 







a 













E 







■ 



B 













^ 













n B B 



■ 







■*-> 









Linear Fit~ 



— 





B 



_ □ 







_0) 



4.0 - 





-B ___ 



^--^.^ 



° B 





B 







X 









B 



B 



■ -^« 



B 

 B 

 ~-- B 



























> 



3.0 - 







■ 



B 





CKB 





— 









■ a 







B 



1 = 



■ 



□ 









B 



B 



B 



B ■ 









2.0 - 



a 



Nauset Beach 



Misquamicut 



Westhampton 





B 









■ 





1.0 - 







■ 



B 

 B 



Jones Beach 

 Long Beach Is. 

 Atlantic City 

 Ludlam Beach 

















0.0 - 























1 1 



1 



1 



1 



1 







-35 -25 -15 -5 5 



Median Volume Change above NGVD, mVm 

 Figure 19. Variation between median volume change and peak wave height 



38 



