BERM ARMOR STONE ROCKING VS H/HD 





12.0 





11.0 





10.0 



6- 





O 



z 



9.0 



o 



8.0 



o 





III 



7.0 



Z 





o 



6.0 



<0 





cc 



5.0 



o 





"> 





(T 



4.0 



< 





IT 



3.0 



III 





OJ 



2.0 





1.0 





0.0 



0.4 



1.2 



0.6 0.8 1 



RELATIVE WAVE HEIGHT, H/HD 

 Figure 18. Percentage of toe berm armor stone 

 which exhibited rocking versus relative wave 

 height (2-D tests) 









2-D TESTS; 



5- & 6.75-FT WAVE FLUMES 





























n 















































































































[] 





a 























D 







D 





















M I^n 





3D 























H 



D 



□a 



D 





















n 



iJUjIl 



D 

 D 



a 



D □ 



















M * 



D 



□ □ 



















n 



X 



n to 



□ D^CID ^ 













□ 



D 



8 LP1 



\ a ^ 



in hi 



°a M cm n 



D D 



a 



D 



a a 



c 



imi3-ifl 





plULttUI 



""""" ' 





r 



pn 















BERM ARMOR STONE DISPLACED VS H/HD 











2-D TESTS; 



5- & 6.75-FT WAVE FLUMES 











26.0 































24.0 































22.0 































20.0 





















































D 





























a 











14.0 























n 









12.0 



















i 





D 



a 



D D 





10.0 























^ U 



3 a 







8.0 



















< 



UL^JL 



a [ 



tffn D 

 1 ,,n 



D 



D 



D 

 D 

































4.0 















D 



D □ 

 Iff ' 



m' 



W J 











2.0 

 0.0 - 



B 



ED EOT 



FJH1B— f 



D 

 111 llll III 



mJ, 



Bn| 



HI IHIftf 



Bid 



m 



c 



a 











0.6 0.8 1 



RELATIVE WAVE HEIGHT, H/HD 



1.6 



Figure 19. Percentage of toe berm armor stone displaced 

 versus relative wave height (2-D tests) 



33 



