Table 1. (Continued) 



LOP° 



Site-LOP 



Site 



Date 



No. 

 Nigh 



s 



Wt^ 



Night 

 Average 

 (lanes) 



Residual discrepancy 



with computation 



(cec)" 







"Near" Site 



LOP 



's (Continued) 







CR-FP 



Den Helder, 

 Netherlands 



Jul 65 



2 









1.84 





22.6 



CR-SU 



La Coruno, 

 Spain 



Nov 64 



1 







54.84 



- 6.2 



CR-FP 



Norfolk, Va. 



Apr 65 



13 







349.88 



-11.2 



HK-FP 



Norfolk, Va. 



Apr 65 



5 









510.19 



- 7.5 



CR-SU 



Portland, U.K. 



Nov 64 



2 









7.49 





- 1.6 



CR-SU 

 1; 



Rotterdam, 

 Netherlands 



Oct 64 



1 







.72 



28.8 



bit 





Site-LOF 



's With Arctic Path Component 







HK-SU 



Den Helder, 

 Netherlands 



Nov 64 



6 







381.98 



23.5 



HK-FP 



Las Palmas, 

 Canary Islands 



Feb 65 



2 







527.95 



- 1.8 



HK-FP 



Tenerife, 

 Canary Islands 



Feb 65 



] 







528.26 



5.0 



Notes: a. LOP's coded slave minus master as follows: HK, Haiku; FP, Forestport; SU, Summit; CR, 

 Criggion. "Near" site-LOP's hcve path components less than 700 n.mi.; site-LOP's with 

 arctic path components include propagation in arctic regions of poor conductivity. 



b. Weights approximately equal to square root of number of nights of observation (except "near 

 site-LOP's and LOP's with arctic path components). 



c. Residual positive if observation greater than computation, i.e., positive residual indicates 

 additional net delay. Note that a delay on the path to the master station will yield a 

 negative residual. 



15 



