Table 6 

 Design Stresses for Various Polos Applications 



LOCATION 



ABR 



H 



r 



w 



s 



STRS 



STRN 





ft 





ton 





psi 



psi 



Azzawiya 



Az 



23.0 





12.13 



2.4 



668 





Baie Comeau Quebec 



BC 



32.8 



0.3 



8.05 



2.4 



647 



904.7 



Botany Bay 



Bo 



32.8 



0.32 



14.55 



2.4 



710 





Cape Town 



CT 



25.6 



0.31 



6.62 



2.4 



579 



591.5 



Carboneras 



Ca 



23.0 





11.03 



2.4 



647 





Crescent City CA 



CC 



35.0 



0.32 



42.00 



2.45 



1038 



930 



Cleveland Harbor OH 



CI 



13.4 



0.32 



2.00 



2.4 



366 





East London 



EL 



27.9 



0.34 



19.73 



2.36 



745 



591.5 



Gans Bay 



Ga 



19.7 



0.3 



20.61 



2.4 



846 



613.69 



Gioia Tauro 



GT 



29.5 



0.32 



33.08 



2.4 



934 





Hay Point 



HP 



26.6 



0.32 



11.03 



2.35 



661 



656.75 



High Island 



HI 



35.1 



0.35 



28.01 



2.4 



810 





Hirtshals 



Hi 



12.8 



0.33 



9.48 



2.35 



579 



647.62 



Humboldt Bay CA N 



Hu 



40.0 



0.32 



43.00 



2.4 



1035 





Jubail 



Ju 



16.4 





5.51 



2.4 



557 





Kahului Harbor HI W 



Ka 



34.0 



0.32 



30.00 



2.4 



904 





Koeberg Nuclear Power Sta 



Ko 



23.0 



0.34 



22.05 



2.4 



757 



852.5 



Llanddulas 



LI 



19.7 



0.32 



4.74 



2.4 



496 





Manasquan NJ 



Ma 



25.0 



0.32 



16.00 



2.4 



733 





Mossel Bay 



Mo 



9.8 



0.33 



5.95 



2.4 



495 





Nawiliwiii Harbor Kauai HI 



Na 



24.0 



0.32 



17.80 



2.4 



759 





Oranjemund 



Or 



25.3 



0.31 



11.80 



2.55 



714 



722 



Port Elizebeth Harbor 



PE 



21.0 



0.31 



10.69 



2.38 



670 



682.85 



Pohoiki Bay Hawaii HI 



Po 



12.0 





6.00 



2.4 



520 





Richards Bay 



Ri 



29.5 



0.37 



33.62 



2.4 



827 



695.9 



San Ciprian 



SC 



42.7 



0.35 



55.13 



2.41 



1037 



643.7 



Sines Portugal 



Si 



45.8 



0.35 



47.06 



2.55 



1034 



839.45 



St Helena Bay Cape Province 



SH 



20.0 



0.33 



7.06 



2.43 



554 



650.23 



St Thomas 



ST 



23.0 





10.03 



2.4 



627 





Table Bay 



Ta 



31.3 



0.36 



28.00 



2.45 



807 



830 



Waianai Harbor Oahu HI 



Wa 



11.8 



0.32 



2.00 



2.4 



756 





99. Figure 13 shows most of the structures listed in Table 6 on a 

 design diagram. The hydrodynamic stability line is based on the Hudson 

 equation for a stability coefficient of K d = 16 simply to give some idea of 

 the relative stability of the different applications. Strength lines are 

 plotted for a waist ratio of r = 0.33 and strengths of fj. = 600 and 

 900 psi. Note that the larger dolosse with weights above 30 tons generally 

 fall outside of both the strength and stability lines, medium-sized dolosse 

 are at the corner of the design envelope, and small dolosse with weights below 

 10 tons fall within both the strength and stability curves. It is likely that 



47 



