



^ 





-\ 





\ 





' \ 





\ 





\ 





\ 





V \ 



CONFIGURA TION 7 





\ 



^N. 



\ 





V. 





^^ ^ 



CONFIGURA TION 2 ^ 

 1 1 



l_ 1 1 1 1 ! I 1 



0.38 0.4 0.42 

 RELATIVE FREEBOARD, F' 



Figure 8. Comparison of data trends for Configurations 1 and 2 



Figure 9. Configuration 2, seawall with standard riprap revetment 

 as it appeared in the model study 



21 



