5.25 Mean damage versus mean maximum eroded depth and mean minimum 



cover depth for Series C 108 



5.26 Mean damage versus mean maximum eroded length for Series B' 109 



5.27 Mean damage versus mean maximum eroded length for Series C 109 



6. 1 Prediction of damage variability, characterized by the standard deviation, 

 asafunctionofmeandamagefor Series^', 5', and C Ill 



6.2 Prediction of mean maximum eroded depth as a fimction of mean damage 



for Series^', 5', and C 112 



6.3 Prediction of standard deviation of maximum eroded depth as a function of 

 mean damage for Series .(4 ', B', and C 1 12 



6.4 Prediction of mean of eroded length as a function of mean damage for 

 Series^',.^', and C 114 



6.5 Prediction of mean minirmim cover depth as a fimction of mean damage for 

 Series^',5', and C 115 



6.6 Prediction of standard deviation of minimum cover depth as a fimction of 



mean damage for Series A ', B', and C 116 



6.7 Damage prediction relations compared to data for Series A' 125 



6.8 Damage prediction relations compared to data for Series B' 126 



6.9 Damage prediction relations compared to data for Series C 126 



7.1 Stone mass distributions for riprap and imderlayer 130 



7.2 Probability density function for normalized damage S* for 



Series Z)', £', F', and G' 132 



7.3 Probability density function for normalized eroded depth E* for 



Series £)',£', F', and G' 132 



7.4 Probability density fimction for normalized cover depth C* for 



Series £)',£',F', andG' 133 



7.5 Prediction of damage variability, characterized by the standard deviation, 



as a fimction of mean damage for Series B\ D', E', F', and G' 134 



