Figure 5.16 shows mean eroded depth and mean cover depth versus mean 

 damage for Series A '. As one would expect, cover depth is inversely related to damage, 

 while eroded depth is directly related to damage. Eroded depth and cover depth are 

 clearly inversely related. Similarly, Figure 5.17 shows that mean eroded length and 

 mean damage are directly related. 



Hs{cin) = 9J8 



[1.6 

 1.9 



13.2 

 2.2 



10.1 13.0 



1.7 1 Z2 



14.9 



2.5 





ILL! 



■il.5- 

 ts 



lO 



1 1- 



Q. 



a> 

 Q 



io.5- 



n -> 

















♦ 













••' 



^ 



» 





J» 





• 



•• ** 



«• • 









"I'^K 



1 











• 



• 











. 



• 







° a" 



"-'-. 



%■ 















•^B^ 





depth = 11.9 cm 



1 



depth = 15.8 cm 





2 



4 



Mee 



B 8 1 

 in Damage, S 



1 



2 1- 





• meas. E ■» meas.'C 





















Figure 5.16. Mean damage versus mean maximum eroded depth and mean minimum 

 cover depth for Series A ' 



103 



