provide a description of the alongshore variability of damage that is reasonable for 

 experimental results described herein. 







6 















































©2.5 - 



0) 



CO ii 



E 

 Q1.5 - 



a 1 - 



w 

 0.5 - 





























=_ 























« .-'« 



1 





^^^ 



' 











n 



a 





*^^^ 



• 



' 









J 



*■»^^" 

















-^-tf 



1f>* 







































^^ 



















A 



f» 



















r 





















u -< 



c 



2 4 6 

 Mean Damage, S 



8 1 







• Series B' = Series D' ▼ Series E' 



* Series F *• Series G" Eq. 6.1 

















1 



Figure 7.5. Prediction of damage variability, characterized by the standard deviation, as 

 a function of mean damage for Series B',D', £", F', and G' 



7.4 Eroded Profile Prediction 



Figure 7.6 shows the mean eroded depth ^'for the four new series as a 

 function of 5^ along with Series B'. Equation 6.2, for prediction ofE based on Series A', 

 B', and C, is also plotted in Figure 7.6. It is clear that this equation describes the new 

 data well without modification. The standard deviation for eroded depth o^ as a 

 function of 5 is shown in Figure 7.7 for the four new series and B'. Equation 6.3 for o^ 

 as a function of S, also plotted in Figure 7.7, underestimates the variability of eroded 



134 



