LIST OF FIGURES (cont.) 



Figure 3-8. REMOTS® photographs from 100W (A), CTR (B), and 50E (C) showing 

 poorly sorted sediments and decreased prism penetration depths. 



Figure 3-9. REMOTS® photographs from 350W (A) and 300W (B) showing 



homogeneous, well-sorted sediment with relatively well-defined RPD 

 and ambient camera penetrations. 



Figure 3-10. REMOTS® photographs from 100E showing surface layer of shell lag. 



Figure 3-11. REMOTS® photographs from 300E (A) and 350E (B) showing dense 



surface tubes and extensive reworking of top centimeters of sediment. 



Figure 3-12. Frequency distributions of small-scale surface boundary roughness 

 values for all photographs of the REMOTS® transect study of the 

 historic CCDS mound. 



Figure 3-13. Frequency distributions of the apparent RPD depths for all photographs 

 of the REMOTS® transect study of the historic CCDS mound. 



Figure 3-14. REMOTS® photographs from 150W (A) and (B) showing moderate 

 sorting of sediment, reworking of sediment surface, and moderate 

 prism penetration depths. 



Figure 3-15. REMOTS® photographs from station 350W (A) and (B) showing large 

 burrow (A) and feeding void (B), indicative of Stage III taxa. 



Figure 3-16. REMOTS® photographs from stations 200E (A), 300E (B), and 350E (C) 

 showing dense tube population with thicker tube, indicative of Stage II 

 amphipods. 



Figure 3-17. Frequency distributions of Organism-Sediment Indices for all photographs 

 of the REMOTS® transect study of the historic CCDS mound. 



