Figure 15. 
Figure 16. 
Figure 17. 
Figure 18. 
Figure 19. 
Figure 20. 
Figure 21. 
Figure 22. 
Figure 23. 
Figure 24. 
Figure 25. 
Figure 26. 
Figure 27. 
Figure 28. 
Figure 29. 
Figure 30. 
Figure 31. 
Figure 32. 
Figure 33. 
Figure B1. 
Figure B2. 
Figure B3. 
Figure B4. 
Figure BS. 
Beach profiles used in cross-shore analysis ................-- 21 
Beachiprofilerevolutionjatistay sierra eerie ae 22 
Beachyprotileievolutioniat sta Ose ister riee eee 22 
Beachipronilesevolutioniatystay// 5s wr een steieen keke 23 
Beachypronilerevolutionpat sta 45)-ar-ep tare ei iene rie ae 24 
Beach profile evolution at sta240.......................... 25 
Beach profile evolution at sta 232 ...................0.0005. 25 
Beach profile evolution at sta 208 .......................... 26 
Beach profile and equilibrium profiles at sta275 .............. 28 
Beach profile and equilibrium profiles at sta240 .............. 28 
Three phases of observed sediment transport in vicinity of 
MOVING FOSS, sco choc seccddavodoodeasosondmeobodor 3] 
Proportion of material remaining, M, in region placed .......... 33 
Estimates of percent of fill volume retained within 
MACHEN ANE, co dgcopoartaponndebnodoudoocobpoodamodoo 35 
Nearshore bathymetry model (February 1993) ................ 38 
Nearshore bathymetry model (October 1994) ................. 39 
Nearshore bathymetry model (March 1995) ................-. 40 
Nearshore bathymetry model (October 1995) ................. 4] 
Evolution of mean high water shoreline ..................... 43 
Elevation difference (March versus October 1994) ............ 44 
Beach profile evolution (sta 208) ..................-.--2-5 B2 
Beach profile evolution (sta 224) ....................0205. B2 
Beach profileevolution (sta 232) 22 ..25.05-2.-...5..-4+--- B3 
Beach profile evolution (sta 240) ................0-...005- B3 
Beach profile evolution (sta 245) .............. 0.0.0 20005. B4 
