1300- 



1200 -j 



1100 -j 



£^1000^ 



c 



.2 900^ 



en 



(£ 800^ 



0) 



■E 700- 



Q) 



^ 600- 

 500-1 

 400 -j 



Minimum Shoreline Positions 



Alternatives 1 & 3 



tL::U 



75-ft berm 



Minimum 

 Shoreline Positions 



Alt. 1 



Alt- 3 



2000 



'!■''!' 

 3000 4000 



■ I ' ' ' I ' 

 5000 6000 



7000 8000 



' I ■ ' ' I LJ 



9000 10000 



Alongshore Distance (ft) 



Figure 30. Shoreline comparisons between Alternatives 1 and 3 





Impacts on Design Requirement 









Alternatives 1 & 3 







100 n 



/•i 







Alternative 



90- 



/' 



1 





<U 80^ 





3 

















.!= C 



' 1 1 









-5 70- 



,-.' ' ' 



1 y \ 

















o ro 



y ' 



V' 1 







W 1 60^ 



/ ; 









"S w 



,' 









9^-50- 



y ' 









•= CD 



^-^ ^ ^ ^ 









^ a) 



-' y- - -^ 









S^ 1-40- 



/' ^ 









cc: «3 



.' ,' 



















O ° 30, 









to 





w ^ 





\ ^.^ 



1 ^ 



^ 





^ 8 20: 

 §. q3 - 



/ ' p 





1 e) 



8 



CD 





E -& 10- 



/ ' £ 





1 







0- 



/ ' «n 











' '' ' '' 1 ' ' ' 1 1 ' ' ' ' 1 ■ ' ' 



' 1 1 1 1 ' ' 



' ' 





2C 



00 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 80 



00 9000 



10000 





Alongshore Distance (ft) 







Figure 31 . Protective berm impacts for Alternatives 1 and 3 



Chapter 3 Functional Design 



33 



