E EBRUARY a 
128 THE AGRICULTURAL GAZETTE. 
property, Lord St. Leonar ds, i his manual c of | destruction ‘of the farm MM s. The defendant objec der, making the star at 
“Pro w,” which was dA for e express | Pay, on a the gr mo at} — hen A agg i = E very unsteady and “ital "et turning Ta the 
purpose of 1 the unlearn singe bi law as to | stated in the form of an e D * to the plantiffs’ decla a0 3 | 
the sale, purchase, leasing, and oth of dealing ^ obj sel by demur to these facts, as got, and the p^ — p d n, tlle eg ^ 
wi ith real estate, has laid it down that; i we a landlord has claim the claim wa performed in part of four da ' 
It : [cylinder en en 1 was at work. Js, ‘when t the pe 
ment of rent if he declines to lay out the money in | uld * On the two publie trial 
rebui nt ut the Court of dee Bench M on 202 acres were bs. ughed in ri ys and ge 
18 hex of 524 n 60 hou hours 
i 8 
cellor. By the Scotch law, says Lor d Campbell, the lear, that h p : t|hoursa d T 8 days 
& at y : ims ET "d pesi oned by an accident which he did not | M cun s 7 One halo 4 the land Dr. ; 
the law . England, if -— be an absolute co m " undertake to stand to. I am much surprised it should be 
looked upon as so clear a thing that there should be no defence s are of opin , 
pay t, the covenant m A. LI en though the tos such an action at law, and that such a case should not be | this la "e js je ips see. mt that the cost ot y me 
much an eviction as if it had been an eviction | amount to 227. 15s. ; allow; x . 
ng, howeve 
. is deriving no benefit f the pre See. sidered € 
then, the 1 in which sere ied in n England i is of "tle, for the destruction of the house is the destruction short da d 
I if Y lease or terms of hire poen ro- He ee see! Selon. — for vien Ti the Eds ‘ays and wet weather, 
e is equi or an - vel 
on for cessation or abatement of rent in case | junction till the house is rebuilt." Defendant's counsel further 
of fi fire cnt the premises are reinstated—unless i y in the 
t be bound by his covenants to reinstate, and of which it is thus laid down: “If you (the landlord) have in- 
sured, although not bound to do so, and received the money, * The « 
few y. 
y 
— ore to — for himself. It may * that 
landlords would take advantage of such a state of the A RUM ri i payment o CC plougiman, 35. ; labo 
law, or that few tenants would place themselves in MM Driven zi for the Te gran stated that there were peculiar at ls. 3s.; coals, 7s.; water, 
such relations 22 a landlord as to provoke him to mstances which led e non-reinstatement of the pre- | rest at 5 per cent., tear 
stan * unri Fes y" —— SRF Nr which the 8 had himself alone to blame. | 10s. ; Wear at 20 
d upon ngly ghteous^ a “right ;” | Immediately mam money was received from the Insurance » Bd. ; cost of removal, se 1 at th 177 
and * iti is s that tenants iri nns —— so long | Office, the fuv. J. Elwes, one of the plaintiffs, went to the per day, or 127. 12s, per . ei 
e in this state of t jeopardy, only one, | farm With his builder, to make arrangements for the reinstat-.| Cost of ploughing 35 acres M nord 8 
not v ol case, is cited to prove un the great dard ues but he withdrew when he found that the | WES ea steam plough 121. às. A rr 
property-lawyer is in error. But the fact that the law | have a alti 5 he a ba gany tenant, set up a claim to going cal aletin are made on four da 
has - sche Du slept, does "^ e it € the dut 8 accepting an offer to hi rA pies 3 e ey Pm "bt i al aud Wata d + 
u i e 
every tenant to see that i ns law no longer, o x d Tone * 7500. The dete nant pak ia the ve pont for thre day, 1L. 6s. b. ot 88 ôs, and Pn. : 
7 successive fter th ^c n HN 
* x7; self y Ea ip A g stipulations fiom his — 9 off on the nous vp the bu dg . n Be filer ed. | Weekl Un 
A 8 power, tect himself | The farm eas ecd last A mmer, and it was not “til RER = “ ote. EST un 
uring the currency of hi dé d 1 1 insuring in | ale, when the defendunt was calet upon for the halty : e work gene m the sanp 
his own name the buildings which he occupies. For let al Lady-day (235L) that he laid claim to such s y thi 1 
us just see how this promulgation of the law will warr, M PA fn i own obstinacy the promis ‘ously pu “After 1 ough ig 5 Stew ahl. 
— 8 though there are some exceptions, | been reinstated soon after the ive deat frayed, On the maS taken to Polmaise Home Farm, w Mu it t is 
insures: it now ap that, if there te fen of the legal right to p vin the rent, plaintiff’s counsel several acres of heavy clay; her 4] 
8 with the tenant, the landlord, whether rel Sucked by Vins. eo € of setae Caton Ss 1 Simons Feces 146, | quite so satisfactory as the fencing in in the " 
— 5 sured, t bound to reb mild: he | to the authorities cited in favo ur of t he de as opposed ad ed pe ll, which might 
y ore M dens. to i Res what he is Fem bound Lord Campbell E - by the T the trench i 
iene ied by of Scotland, if premises plough t p p 
2 ag vagad hem SON the uu the tenant; or he poorly cg eg p^ t1 hs N ym dis AUR ved fr io . of fe that asleription Of soil; still, whee ite mei 
—he may take advantage, when a fire | covenant to pa th PT gu 2 
of a “sleeping lion," as such laws have been | the tenant derived us ben cit trom the pron 8 — d As it onsidered desirable to 
and im upon a tenant the burden of rein- Scotland, where sh it turned e k 1 
1 d dere out there | Work on l g dryfield land, it was taken h 
stating, for which he had not covenanted, or the 1 o grouse, the Y ment of rent might — DH fC ut 
and inconvenience attending the want of fee erret 4 Wm 55 tho was mo answer to an son Ma Polmai —.— ie eek wn eee 
" $ h - 25 that the had „where P 
tion for his business. We have no doubt that the Jor was ita Y round Sa the mise bal be “or a G Co ire ag rate style. On the to ; piongiied severi 1 1 
Court of Queen's Bench is right, and that Lord St. they Tad It wae said e pisiytt tiffs had insured, though porto were requi af od: 11 0 
Leonard's is wrong in th T not . g e ured for the bearance of the 
E thero is uo er in e stement of the| weet "t STU hat wt [mdm owing to the undulating nim d 
“ Handy Book,” that the landlord is not bound to pos lay out the iu e aia Hur end the bon at aan 
insure, and if the house be burn D doen. iii ST brought an action against the tenant for 1 the rat Tut pe his tip d i ha n attending the vM 
3 the tenant must ped to pay he rent for what ference of à Cour hi xu formed the ground for the inter & f he 
85 1 the use of; but otherwise, if ( Simons, 146) pep . toe bene bya ve tof ES ES hr sinoo warst 5 A 
insur N " 5 iD 13 a court o improve is apparat 
between the landlord iu e TIAM ia bain Fe vid o ORE oue a 88 and win nd s in aparate en M D 
by which conde nanan takes a lace of the former for oed rm n à rien à that the landi — a — 0 1 eee from field to feih RN 
K contract received the rás ha workin j 
ho party, and f which m ia . Ne which he is | His Lordship — Ra they t bound to lay it out. | instead of coiling a € 
et give toa x tile ta right o f which. he oom jo ar nard's ** Handy Book, "aud “said that if 1 d 85 eo AUR lessening 
fore in enjoymen t. no’ make it law, he should support such a ae: 
pet it was only th proposal; but at xo 
Farmers tenant-householders, then, hav could not Nee r W un the foregoin ona it a 
interest more ent than ire fo on decision The oth y ie Cont to a most solemn j| oF pem 
urgent than for . Hi i) v cr of the e (Justices Wig! biam, ‘Crompton, | large saving by the employment of the stan ie 
an immediate assimilation of D of pid * om Judgment for ae TIER ben and bet Sees lessening o of expense ie o 
tland, in which 2 are pro- Norwich À Pod Tarhan 1898 the pl nd advantage to be der ived from steam » c 
a the Lord Chief Justice; and 3 5 er M. 
nd Pagers J landlords will jus- E FOWLER and makes him m um E of q^ ens 1 
measure. Tt is nothing ag he ight by resisting such a ru STEAM ters UGH. ipei Ga 1. to PER the land in weather when h 
to, the law xh. WESCE a el ud eee ede 
cr er. miel lo the bien 15 A of T of mati le by i on 22 82 farm sr bel dii uium of 60 consider df io 1 
affirm, they were put 2 losses to which, as they Ing, occupi Mr. W. Forrester, in Octo prem 500. Jon 
It is not for us to on Me S e . 5 Mete 
: { nant without a lease | abes a view to the sace en Prrer M‘Ewen, 
conld retain possession, to the detriment of a sale, cultivat entered nto during the Joun S. Jack, 
gain "Aha nic pedir yi t 8 85 uring the x ^ 
. mething on 1 5 that de car by fev pos pro oprie rs and others in the * Having only attended 
but however this may pA the peters} er 10 th of Stirling, soppemented by a dx o orking of the “on was unsatisf 
do not allow that wrong on one 1 m es of justice | from the Highland Society ; two premiums were off. a sign the above, but havi -— . 
by a on 8 the incus d be redressed | Tres E ior A ge = Tei for the two most efficent since I have no ica of the n 
Ina word he farmer or the household or cultivators, the conditi : e Oui 
i f th er must either | Plough or cultivate at the tri sons being, to 
the landlord, if if he have | not E ihe Mul ent from | Td pets and to be more cans tens is s it o fla landod easton le A ore 
1 E - rses, 
iad these, he must insure his tures eG 1 " don Qu premiums were pretty widel Gold den Lion Hotel, to take into consideration 
'orded. ef | 7 , and circulars aoe to most of iu ae I of urchasin hin; pmo 
iEn ovs ati eR implement makers, to the leading $ E. á a ploug 11 ee 
fount or two entered the list Yy regret of the judges, only | tpo% vin oie 
Lofft and others Doni uis eo Y of London, and 1 Baidersto Mid vi, Mr. Fowler, e meeting : Ere 
argument before the full court portant case came on for- “The tri * Gibb’s Hotel, Stirling, Jan. 
appeared for Mr. Capel Lem of pon, emer. Mr. Godfrey | St s mAy e place on th “At fa - de 
atiam; ne Rer. of Bridgewater, So i ewarthall, y Mr. Wili e farm of a meeting of the Meinen efe 
Fodesley, Shropshi tork: Settlewood Gleadowe, of to commence - William Forrester, and | * steam-engine, with ploughs and t mg 
9f Wixoe Rectoty, Ha ded pte Ef Frederick Elwes, “The foll ee M of Octo tober. held here this da 1 r. 2. Nor 
— . wy appeared P for lue mittee of jams gentlemen were named as a com. chair, the chairman stated 
son, Haverhill, attorney for plaine Mr. Jack. | John Murray, of Mouchadan d the premiums :—Messrs, upp a 12-horse double cylinder eng" 
“py the AN Ur. ; Ely, for Leckie; David Stewart of | St rt Graham Moir, o Shuttleworth’s, with all necessary gear 
— 2 . dro appeared that of Leithen ; James Stirlin Bici John Miller, subsoil ploughs, adapted for ploughing . 
«Spinney Abbey." in the paris PISIS Y of a farm cale | Hope, farmer, Fenton Barns; Peter aburgh; George and ordinary ploughs, such as he exhi 
oe time when he entered into n Cambridgeshire. | Driphill; John S. Jack, fam eter M*Ewen, farmer, i double blast threshing mach ble 
—.— bui etn na and. conveniences: no mer ine Patterson, pi Cowie. armer, Carrat; and John Shuttleworth’s, with patent axles a d dow 
pa d tho an ed ed but the lessors effected | On the morning of the trial ie engine, ploughs, and threshing 
ployed ne [y that SN. t the policy. Pur teg cn Tx apis hat o Seine to Sue A Ha enitn inti- Fares <n i 
not being bound t x ings were so insured, and be at the trial with his machi he could no vienen 
2 — ied eei, that, if the buildi machine we understand 5 The principle of this . The meeting unanim 
M M the le would eight-horse » a locomotive engi offer ; and M 
effect any other imma 4 power having gearing atta zma of ; and Mr. Greig, on be 
After the defendant c t wide, placed behi g attached to a to deliver the above- je 
on for had been behind th e e ve-mentior 
many years, the pre t e hinder wheels 
Lc ki oi 1 were destroyed M e land is dug over th eels, y A T ( e pa 
Hoya! Exchange thereupon |, 7 Fowler’s plough howey, engine moved along. “It is understood, i ormi 
ed the full value of the d ages (al oat 16000) rh renes which remained fi "ir or i the gro und, and letter, that before the company are T 
se! > c : 
remises or any part of phe however, to th 2 doi ap that plo xt was : judges " Was Ned over and pay for the above, they sha 
iio dus, d and su er e prem worthy to receive | work to . i x “Hor of 
1 ney brought an action agains mut Long elbe fst d r the satisfaction of Mr. Miller, 
ng no reduction on account o. ay of the trial was rar on - tirling Journal a 
" "d ks) the ua eport, observes :— 
We are glad to see the enterprise dispar? 
