THE GARDENERS CHRONICLE AND BERTA. GAZETTE. LJutx 16, 189, 
obtaining the requi ~ object hout | interference ment, Sir A. . AGNEW post pone ned bis "motion on the 
of a public ' quite “willing SN consent e Salute to Religious Processions—Mr. E. JAMES mov ed fo 
th 
Barnes, : ter, repudiated any desire ts =a 
Established mes = p simply wis y veris e to EU 
series of papers relating to the differences between Mr. Chisholm keep its hands off the no ni 
t 
hurch — 
b each 4 
i: MES * 
IE ave to bring in a Bill to di 
regulation of Municipal Corporations in Church by robbing it of its ancient rights a à 
130, reed to.—In Sir W. SOMERY: ine o intro- | MELLOR 5 the Bill —Mr. PACKE 7 Supported the 
reply to Ir. Barnes, Sir G. C. Lewis said that the right of | duce a Bill to extend the act MA the improvement of| ment.—Mr. HEN Y thought this 
i e oya n 
n the 
draw the monopoly which they had granted to the submarine | manner proposed in the — PE to te mecs ; 
telegraph. This the Meg 1 refused to do. The on its merits as Ww "7 form he ho would ^i : bad 1o E 
present Government then decided on re — permission to Ados ccena 2 arks by Mr. W. Writes, Mr. | object the faf of con ater tious D Diss 
the company to lay its wires T9 to the shore. — this | MoNSELL, Mr. C. C. Ohr. 1 = Cap — in JERVIS, Lord PAL- | of one of “the prineipian x t Dreh “cnt 
the company pleaded its Act of Parliament, ‘willeh e mpted | MERSTON said, that although, like all other arrangements, this | Fermoy supported the second ut Beat 
them from such interruption till x 1862. The > question had | system was 1 liable to some 5 he believed that, on | destroy the Church of E + ena] ed m eps LT 
been referred to the law officers of the Crown, who had | the 8 A had tended very much to the advantage of the = gee Pe church 
ecided in favour À 
h — — 
BUTLER, th X ove j rant Y 1 ect 
was not the intention of her Majesty's Government to intro- | missioners that some of the questions were open to ection ; 
duce any measure during the present session by which the | and the answer was that they were supernumerary questions, 
mode of assessment and collection of the fe Armi by local added to the r C pee eme in order to test the general 
ered. isti mpara 
and Com d bein T 
if they would state whether it Sn 25 mere military conven- | posed by Mr. 3 Colonel DuNNE moved to substitute 
i t ons f ?— | certain Irish m h bers; but after 
Lord J. RussELL said that nothing appeared on the face of the some discussion. he withdrew the motion on an understanding 
ri ; 
r Cc d 
u 
„ istice was m 
= he pes that during that interval the belli igerent a: the — Es ittee on Packet and Telegraphic Contracts.— 
i r. RoEBUCK asked whether, in appointing this committee, it | 1 
t 
oul y to he ond ren 
pem ane Ay = He repeated, however, that there was moaning was intended to call in question the acts of past Governments, that, in committee, some arrange 
on the face of the armistice further than the suspension of | or only to bring upon the late Administration a responsibility 3 oe Ee dug e paym 
hostilities. — —.— to a further —.— from Mr. DISRAELI, | for their conduct? — The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER 
Lord J. R replied that no furthe cialinformation had | repeated what he had stated when h d for the committee 
* a m four Ambassador at Par —tha did not intend to place any li ion upon the 
St. James’s Park.—On the motion for going into committee of functions of mittee.—Mr. MAGURE objected h 
supply, Mr. KiNNAIRD called attention to the propriety of | mame of Mr. Baxter, and moved t omitte: na 
eet a for the passage of carriages and horses from am: i as d d by 185 to 34, and the otber 
Charing Cross through Spring Gardens into St. James's Park, eed to. r. CARDWELL (à leave to 3 
agree 
Commissioner of Works wheth of Boundaries 
intended to avail himself of the opportunity afforded by the | in Ireland. The Admiralty Court Bill passed sid — 
pulling down of Berkeley House, and to take steps for €— Ü The adjourned debate upon the second reading of the Komam 
this. 2 en Lord wed by Lord | Catholic Relief A ment Bi 
r. NEW: 
J. E dedos ed the House the important | GATE, who moved to defer the second reading for three months. Salmon Fishery Bill. 
question of and 5 sho ou be taken into He denied that the disqualification which this Bill was intended | way Arbitration Bill And read a 8 
— sa Aer Y some remar! -— Mr. TITE, ues CFrrzROY | to remove was the result of a mistake of Sir R. Peel, of whose | obtained leave to bring in a Bill to 
said that Mr. Kinnaird should have shown the gre at advan: antage speeches he read extracts, observing that the aad —— 1856). 
of the proposed *'i Nó Was and X it co could be accom- | of Ireland was the constitutional adviser of the reign, Tuurspay.—City of London Reform.—Sir G. 
plished at a small c He repared to take issue wit th of the Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland in the sbéenos of ‘the to Sir J. that he intended 255 proc 
him upon bo E pointe. He pere the ‘adv antage would be | Sovereign, with respect to gs matters touching ecclesiastical 
small, and that the expense would be not less than 53,0001. | preferment. He entreated the Government not to suffer an 
men's Bounty.—Sir J. PAKINGTON aioe ds ie explana. | 8 member to ed with the principles of a — 
tion of the announcement made by the Mies of thei: —.— med B. BnipoEs seconded the amendment.— 
ion to extend the bounty offered to seamen pes nin ztia Hw — rted the Bill, he said, upon the E 
fleet to seamen who had already joined. — no other instances announce — by t the — — of the. Roman ‘Catholic 1 <3 
had ——— been made retrospective, and the pre nt | namely, e equal civil and religious re 
would act as a serious check upon future boetties E vo eld exceptions should nd — only. Map ware ousted we 8 dal 
x E end, jn the 2 jock wal —Lord C. Pacer hoped and peculiar circu E said that if the 
Ed — or ect — 7 — postponed till the exception in the 28880 ‘cation ewig toan inad- 
RU un as brought forward. | vertence of Sir R. Pun at the 1 ot emancipation were 
The rmy In ET to Colonel Dickson, Ganet Perr stated equally mistaken, for this very exception was found in all the 
w in the country, on the Ist of Bills, of 1813, 1821, and 1825. The principle kept in view by Sir 
June [aes 25 109,000 600 po 1 ing the embodied militia, R. Peel, as shown in his published posthumous papers, was not 
— ig the oed ashore, pensioners, and constabulary.— limited to the exercise of ecclesiastical patronage by the Irish 
W. WiLLIAMS made some warm strictures - | Lord Chancellor, but had regard to the sec 
— MI Flogging in the Navy on the sentence of a single man. | tant constitution and the Act V — mM — : Lord 
If done at it should be by sentence of court-marti AX Chancellor — E as Lord igh’ he present 
C. Narrer defended the system of bounty, which ought to Lord Chancell — — Gee delegito: — Per 
of sufficient amount to induce able XM to Anica! the vie. in Ireland. Hes -— — the Bill, which he 
=S regard to flogging in the — . he did not believe that it denounced in ag te Jedi s as well as impolitic 
meas 
as Act— 
e HEQ ue. — 
the House a 12 0 X when the tenen was ordered to | Whiteside was mistaken in supposing§that a Roman Catholic ish. Joint — puer Snot 
report p . GILPIN moved the second reading of | might fill the office of Lord Justice; this was expressly for- ag no inten tention. in tbe 
the Poor — Boards Sat rer dhe of Debts) Bill. —Mr. WALTER — 4 hibit by statute, and it was not proposed to repeal that pro- i th 
that — on. a ——— w ~ Peel 
Ww 
Ee en Succeed N yt the was that — — Dr zer ~ — — the — ^ 
three months.—Mr. S. ESTCOURT — He | ment, sin nee RU E hie v ttle- | for the reserved half. Pay o romotion 
S REA 3. Esrc ce, MA peace and union, he oer i fas ect of prom: j 
explained the circumstances. oor Af the House Cl. Dic ussi n took lace on ox gare "le sketch of a 
f : 
which 
3 ic 
: a m the adj rd PALMERS — 
ratepayers should be — to ma for the 
incurred un pay debts | thought the Bill was in strict —— with the spirit of - oficere of a certain 
re he brou 
entleman had left . — Petore and b 
mere s other 
xe ias 
ond time. The None of our institutions Cu in the slightes i puri from ox "gent mU ote for the gran 
d d i 
Lr J. 
n 
Court of. Proba 45 as rend "P 
: CUR te, yr F ia. Ru the Clerk of — Bill, janet he trusted t| us 
—— 
TurspAY. On eis rii " Grieve à 
emt Dii, Tee object et of which wa te Shing Sein E Grievey a S on —— — it was —— fva -— 
5 — Pt — in d, to take his siderable difficulty as to the — exercised by the Lord 
moved asan au quon it be read a second timo that day — — md. He did — thats —— —— 
i à „ required; 
under the censure of the Bishop of Aberdeen, in conn ection but this ought to be shown. He shold ke thx — s question to be florts of p Maw y to 
with the case of Mr. Cheyne, he ought not to be allowed an referred to a select committee, and if this was agreed to he 1 er 
0 unity of ä his heretical doctrines in this | Should support the second reading. gar G. Liv was prepared the — of that = 3 
ay da rd PALMERSTON opposed the Bill, consid ering i to agree to this proposition, and recommended Sir W. s 
high time to stop privita Bills the object of which was to m. Somerville to accede to it.—Sir W. SOMERVILLE accepted the 
3 the Lowe aw Li tie MAS L- ON & division tho proposal. —Sir W. Mites pressed the adjournment of the debate. 
Lord T 
'olonel i 
Dima " R : P but a division was called fi i 
ELI, osere, said d le ia had be end informed Baers the by 210 to 142, and, — or, —— — Seen the debate, 
had been signed on Monday, and since then he E ed a gt the sugges estion of Lord PALMERSTON, -was- adjourned t 
telegram from Lord Cowley, L9 4. — N FUNK mae 
MS oa = added, w to a AA, “that WEDNESD. uren Rates.— 
ue of the French would . — that o eic demand be a Sir Joh 2 peni from lines 
Sud did noe im, LAM the Emper: — no si — f the — —— Rate Abolition 
addition = an amendment, that the Bill be read a second time that day mbodi 
In reply to RUNI T Hoss said 1 the Sove six eel He contended that the Bill was "ue more ner |n condition of o 
xs s /* Go — ae the i much pressed upon | less than sure of s MEC ex bos first step to the 8 which must 
2 E. iter was under con- aa of f the Established Church.—Lord TR. Moss NTAGU | 110,000 men befo ——— he 
Rm. seconded the amen €: 5 the object oft the measure | Sir M. Pero d 
HERBERT, who s made a brief explanatory | was to sever the m between Church and State. —Mr. | French army as it bad 
r. DILLWYN, in the —— 
ss, moved the — readi ng d other p 
Bill.—Mr. D 3 
