% melt (V2 



250 



200 



150 



100 



50 



50 



Figure C-la. 



100 150 



%melt(V,) 



200 



250 



% melt (V-) 



Figure C-1b. 



50 



)00 150 



% melt (V,) 



200 



250 



% melt (V, 



250 



200 



150 



100 



50 



Figure C-1c. 



50 



100 150 



% melt (V,) 



200 



250 



Figure C-1. Comparative Effects of FLENUMOCEANCEN GSOWM Products on IIP Iceberg Deletion Criteria. 

 These scatter diagrams show the "percent of melt" at the time a random series of icebergs of like size were 

 deleted from the IIP database. The abscissa represents the "percent of melt" calculated using significant 

 wave height and primary wave period as inputs to the IIP deterioration model. The ordinate represents the 

 "percent of melt" calculated using sea height and sea period as inputs. The dashed line represents a 1 :1 

 relationship. The solid line is the linear regression fit. The observation period is June/July 1988. Figure C-1 a 

 depicts the melt comparison for 58 large (213m long) icebergsl; Figure C-lb is for 102 medium (102m long) 

 icebergs; and Figure C-lc is for 71 small (60m long) icebergs. The large concentration of data points in 

 Figures C-1 b and C-1 c in the right hand portion of the graph is due to the large number of small and medium 

 icebergs that were deleted after exceeding 175 percent of predicted melt. 

 84 



