MOUNDVILLE REVISITED. 
Vessel No. 106 from the ground south of Mound D (Fig. 23), has a curious 
marginal decoration of the “ wall of Troy” pattern. 
Vessel No. 103 from the ground south of Mound D (Figs. 
bearing an incised decoration, the interpretation 
power. 
24. 25). is a bottle 
of whieh is entirely beyond our 
But as “по savage ever sat down to decorate an article from mere fancy 
with meaningless designs," ' this apparent confusion of line-work must stand for 
something, and may be interpreted some day. 
ч 
| 
" 
ifl 
Jd] 
qu 
727 
ТД 
E 
ЖЕ, 
« 
K 
Ё 
ill 
( | 
1 
ч 
\ 
4 
"Dr 
А \ | 
Ж 
Y 
4772 
ЕЗІ 
[4 ж. 
: 
\/ 
S 
ГД 
M 
T 
SS 
AE 
hr 
y 
(И 
E 
К 
(| 
© 4 
Т 
EET 
"V, 
SHE 
+ 
K 
а 
Am 
(Қ 
S 
== 
m 
= 
/ 1 
2 
5 
1G 
22 
хах 
т) 
ae 
= 
= 
Bae 
a | 
X 
% 
1 
і 
Б жез 
CH 
mw 
Im 
—- 
2 
f 
MK 
Е 
| 
FIG. 25.—Vessel No. 103. Decoration. (About half size.) 
Vessel No. 110 from the ground south of Mound D (Fig. 26), a water-bottle of 
brown ware, of the fish-effigy variety, might have come from Tennessee instead of 
from Moundville, so far as any difference between it 
detected. 
Vessel No. 15 from the field west of Mound R is a bowl (Fig. 27), represent- 
ing a fish, spines are shown on the back, while projections below indicate the 
ventral fins. 
and Tennessee ware can be 
Fie. 26.— Vessel No. 110. Ground south of Mound D. 
i 5.4 i es.) 
(Maximum diameter 5.4 inch 
Fic. 97.— Vessel No. 15. Field west of Mound R. 
(Maximum diameter 12.5 inches.) 
1 Lumholtz. 
