Serremeer 21, 1895.] 
THE GARDENERS’ 
CHRONICLE. 
339 
is producing a growth on the side of a pseudo- 
bulb, and а Lycaste Skinneri with a new 
growth on the top of an old 3 bulb, There 
September number of The Orchid 
. 268, refe — to Cattleya 
labista, Pseudo- bulbs “clavate; 2 monophyllous,’ 
I recently purchased a — f Cattleya labiata 
autumnalis, of which the followi — is а deseription. 
Balbs five, all of the etout, club-shap гре, each 
about 7 inches long. This year's кыны, в шопо- 
phyllous, and bears the usual —.— flower-sheath. 
Last years was similar, but I was told that the 
sheath was abortive. Th me * d 
bulbs, both of which 3 produce 
and then the firat (or s again mon 
The diphyllous bulbs are A» the others, but their 
leaves are ques er, wider, and very thick. Perhaps 
some other espondents may be able to remark 
on these —— subjects, 
Fie. 65 —cross- HOLDER, 
NEW INVENTIONS. 
TO DISPLAY SHOWER BOUQUETS, 
WirH а view to simplifying this operation, a 
holder or stand, the * of which is illus 
trated ia figs. 63, 64, 65, has been designed and 
у btained from verd er man IA 
132, Commercial м k This pate 
гова holder, 2 for ilo 
made in brass, either 
The Herga мд 
- 
orists and ex 
X9 4s nickel- злучаў 
he appliance, but we add that 
beider ia наре, aplit, E furnished А 
pipa, А ring, and сап be expanded or contracted, 
to any angle um means of t 
The | trumpet-holder - be removed, an 
au ted in the case of wreaths or similar designs. 
21 —— telescopic, p its length is regulated 
y але 
LAW NOTES. 
SHEPHARD у, TOOGOOD & SONS. 
LS 
magistrates, Messrs. Toogood & 
: Above Bar, were summoned for selling мык Rab Mj» 
false trade description, 
Protection Association 
Mr. Tristram, for the Trades’ Mark 
n, prosecuted, and e^ н. D. М. Page 
e sai "y it would be А 2 T to Arih — the 
clients’ defen k it asin 
е 
каде that h e acted Vidt intent to defraud. E fur ther 
t рр 4, must prove that 
having takon a а 5 20 е ы! inst 
2 agai 14 * 
THE 
по reason 
the Ps was аз fol 
means any descrip d. ien = Ж жо, direct 
to the mode of “gored any goods. Mr 
deal at length with 5, and contended that 
come within the — rag "a all. In the firs ret place the Shep- 
seed was only a varie d Kale, 
6 was not produced by Mr. 888 simply жале the 
Fic, 64,—wREATH-HOLDER, 
seed, and Nature did the rest. Then he contended it was not 
а false trade descript ion, inasmuch as it was not calcula ted to 
5 
4 1 
"o ioeluded, he said, some oi 
country, to whom the ees я T. immense importance. 
He also went on * contend that it was recogaised that prion a 
n placed о n the market anyone was T 
* 
е best growers in the 
2 
uote instances of this, and mt: ded that 
i rown 
true ock, Going on to deal with the ae’ nt’s 
evidence, he said the Login gape at the last hear must 
unsatisfactor ву їп el he 
n inte elligent man pn stand before 
gave his evidence r 
say that whilst 10 attached a meaning to Shephard’s 
i s Al Peas was, 
them and 
had assumed a very g bias, an е had not called a 
itness from the trade to support him. also 
; there was no 
names were generally quoted in all catalogues 
of . Hurs uce th an entry of 
Matting’ selected dark red ‚ and he said firm t 
it A man’s particular seed should be sold 
‘under his name, though it be 1 
by him. The u e name was no indication of 
who grew th under offer, It was ех] e 
that seed grown by a d 
although 
^ acum to the first introducer. E oon — dought 
back seeds from farmers stock. Questions 
Parliament. тома. witness said he had never heard any 
tion raised by a person w me the seed to the 
sale of se . Part of seed 
ed by Mr, Payne from the n with 
n resuming, ei ti f th tness 
—— with. —In answer to Mr. Т! . Toogood said 
could show no catalogue of any other firm which contained 
mention of his seeds; he would not в wear that he. 
seen one, Th th 
— Kale was ‘mentioned in them. vertisement 
n 
as stated that all seeds were — by 
s bearing their 
They did not 3 — seed 
explained that all seed 
name were grown by Mon. 
nor did he know anyone who did. This was the first —: his 
firm had sold Shephard’s Kale, and he ш ed other firms 
who sold e Kale, He could not se 
use t 
farmer, ма buy 
Alderman 
must gi 
Witness would swear he had never sold «Shephard Kale ale by 
any other name. He had once sent a packe “ Kale 
grown from — stock” on it, probably j 44 the 
gentleman ordered it uch. 
uM * M said a he had no objection to its being sold in 
amination continued: Mr. Shephard had said he 
ride 
ought oh to 
sell his Kale, ^ Һе said he hada right to do so. 
ale from 's Kale. 
of that name 
not indicative 223 Eis 
old a parcel of —— 
they were grown by Mr. shephard. 
Mr. William James Nutting, of the firm of Messrs, Nutting 
& Son, Southwark „said varieties of seeds 
