Мо+кмвкв 16, 1895.) 
THE GARDENERS’ 
CHRONICLE. 
581 
1 Robb. f., in Gard 
ii 
^ ез, iii., t. 301.— 
Introduced by Kegel to 
the establishment of M. Louis Van Houtte of 
Gand, Belgium, where it flowered in 1847, It 
ia pro obably n ot now in cultivation 
(10. . LACUSTRIS, Rodr. Gen, н Sp. Orch, 
Nov, i. (1877), р. 86; FI. 
304, 
. in ДЇ, Hort. 
887), p. 63, t. 22; Rolfe, in Gard, Chron., 
1892, ii, p. 431. —Up per Amazon, Brezil, 
it is said to grow in large tufts, and to kee 
0 
89.— Habit and general structure of 
Eulophia, from which it is distinguished by 
the presence of a foot to the column, It i 
reduced to opodi by Bentham in the 
Genera niarum, but is certainly distin 
Species about twenty-five, found throughout 
“a tropics, 
(1) C. мааа Eulophia andaman 
ensis, Rchb. n Flora, 2a 3 p. 276; 
kifo Fi.. Ind., vi., Andaman 
ew by the Rev. C. 
flowered in J une, 1862, "The species has alao 
Fig, 100.—view IN THE NEW EVELYN PARK AT DEPTFORD, (seg Р, 576) 
Sent by Mr. —— 
Rand of Pau to е 
Linden of Brussel i 
Vidensk M. Я 3 
fig. 6; Rolfe, in Orch. , ii, р. 300; 
Cogn., in Mart. Fl. Bras., iii., pt. 4, р. 296.— 
Brazil, “Tatroda ced by Mesers. F. Sander & 
e Rio San Francisco, and flowered 
in 
a MINAX, Rehb. f., in Gard. Chron., 
1874, j., p. 786; ii., p. , bc, 1892, 
ii, р. 431.— Habitat not recorded. Fi ered 
in 1874, in the collection of A. Sillem, Etq., 
of Sydenham. It is said e near G. dives, 
but nothing is known ot it beyond the original 
description. 
(13) G. хтултлз, Hort., Gard, Chron 1882, 
‚ fig. 85; Rolfe, le. 751892 ^ 
» d. р. 
4, p. 299. Brazil, in 
the etrict 
in the collection of 
‚ Burford, Dorking, —— nothing 
known of its origin. It h so ттн 
that it was discovered by Mr. E. 8. Rand, of 
Pará, on the Rio Negro, above Mans 5e, where 
flowered in the а during the present 
f 0 ‚ from the original 
importation. 
2) C. BITUBERCULATA, Rolfe. — Leave 
linear-lanceolate, acute, about 18 inches ind. 
Scape about 2 feet long. -— flowered ; bracts 
linear, acumina — 1} inches eae pedicels, 
3—1 inch long; sepais linear-oblo ong, sub- 
se, 9—10 lines — Ughi green; 
-7 lines long, " white ; 
green, si 
g, striped wi urple-brown in front, its 
foot 2 lines long.— Habitat not known. 
Flowered in the Gl nic Garden 
in June, 1890, and on subsequent occasions. 
Mr. Moore had purchased it at Stevens’ Sale 
Rooms in 1881. 
(3) C. — Lindl., Gen. 4 түт Orch СЕ 
р. 189; Ко І, Bot, — 
t 88, fig. 1; ео. f. in Ga rom, 1870, 
p. 1407 ; Culleni, Wight, Г. Р. Ind. 
or., v. p. 21, t. 1754; Eulophia flava, Hook. f. 
Fl, Brit. Ind., vi. p. 7.—W. Tropical — 
Flowered i 
ies ox] Chelsea, in 1870. A very handsome 
P4.) 0 FLEXUOSA, agi in p — Bull., 1894, 
B. Р. 35 E 9.—E. "Trop. 
h. 180; Hook. f. В 
р. 5; Rolfe, in Gerd; Chron., 1891, i, a 701. 
— India. онии in the с ollection of Sir 
‘Barford, orking, in 
n Kew Bulletin, 
Natal. 
Sir hia Lawrence, Bart., Burford, Dorking, 
in y 
7) 0. PLANTAGINEA, Lindl., Gen. and Sp. 
9; Rehb . 6, in Gard. Chron., 1882, 
ii 
gas 
= the —— of Baron Hruby, of адд 
an 
"ву б „ SANGUINEA, Lindl., in Journ, Linn 
Soc., iii, (1859), р ‚ 32; y rx t. 6161. 
Bulophia sanguinea, Hoo E . Brit, Ind., 
vi, p. * Cyrtopera ru a, Thw , Enum, 
Zeyl., Indi а at Kew in 
1874 or Р 1875, and again recently. 
(9.) C. sqUALIDA, а f, in Bonplandia, 
v. (1857). p. 38; Lindl., n Journ. — 
T ма! qualida, Hook, f., Fi. 
a Wie ауа. Poveri at 
Kew in June, T 
(10) C. W ooDFORDI. Lindl., Gen. and 
h., p. 189. Cyrtopodium lfordi, Sims, 
im Bot. Mag., t. 1814; Lindl, Bot. Reg., f. 
1508. Lissochilus атаготісиз Rodr., et Sp. 
ү-н d 4 p. 89. Cyrtopera amazonica, 
i, p. 180. Cyrtopera Velloziana, 
ior. 1 о * v. 179. ipedium epiden · 
64. Paphto- 
pedilu 4 ы in Engl. Bot. 
= ‚р. 42.— Tropical America. 
Sent 
from sU Paul, Brasil, by E. J, A. Woodford, 
Evq., -- Mr, а a , Curator of the 
Apothe ca at Chelsea, where it 
flowered in 1815 or 1816. 2 A, Rolfe. 
FORESTRY, 
THE отой OF OF THE FORESTER. 
kind-hearted foreigner visiting this country 
account of Mr, W. Н, Long's 
need of scientific advice on forestry matters. 
ч to give the first landowner he met the benefit of 
is sympathies on this m it is bard to say whether 
пе attitude of the latter would be one of astonish- 
ent or of momentary а on at the possi- 
bility of unsuspected calamities. Mutual explana- 
tions would disclose a fact which enthusiasts on this 
question would do well to realise, viz, that the great 
proprie 
interest in the economic side of wood m 
owing to the deplorable Jack of technical 3 
on the part 0! The latter are very 
men in their way, say they, with intelligent 
ideas as to the practical part of their work, but are 
sadly deficient in (and here o s almost break 
ur patrons 
down) scientific knowledge. “ Jock ne’er did much 
gude at the achule," said an old Scotch farmer to а 
