THE YOUNG OOLOGIST. 



167 



" We would like very much to have you change the 

 size of the Y. O."— D. B. W., Perry. 



" I am in favor of it and will be glad to pay the dif- 

 ference."— B. B. T., Dayton. 



PENNSYLVANIA. 



" Enlarge the Y. O. by all means. The difference 

 in price will be naught compared to to the information 

 we know we will receive in the additional pages." — 

 G. H. H., Reading, Pa. 



" Keep the Y. O. the size it is. The price will be 

 an objection. There are so many more will take it at 

 what it now is. There is plenty in it to do young 

 folks one month." — I. S. K., Fremont. 



" 1 hope the Y. O. will be enlarged— and will be 

 willing to pay $1.00 per year." — T. D. A., Meadville. 



" I would very much like to have the Y. O. enlarg- 

 ed to thirty-two pages. It would be fully worth $1.0 . 

 I find the paper quite invaluable to me.' — J. P., Ger- 

 mantown. 



" I am very much in favor of enlarging the Y. O. to 

 a 32-page magazine. I think it is the best paper on 

 eggs that could be found." — C. T. L., Philadelphia. 



"' Put my name down by all means as one greatly in 

 favor of of it and willing to pay the extra amount." — 

 W. C., Wallingford. 



"Your little Y. O. is better with every number, I 

 send you on postal card my desire to see it increased 

 to 32 or 64 pages, the expense to subscribers should be 

 no consideration ; it is an energetic, interesting little 

 treasure, and I predict for the Y. O. that inside of five 

 years it will find its proper place among our larger and 

 older literary and art magazines." — H. G. P., Chester. 



" I think it would be invaluable both for instruction 

 and information, therefore I say 32 pages." — R. L. 

 M., Germantown. 



" I agree." — B. R., Shoemakertown. 



" I am pleased to hear that you think of enlarging 

 the Y. O."— C. K., Athens. 



" I was very sorry to hear in the February number 

 that you might change it to $1.00. If you are going 

 to I can not take it I would be very sorry if you 

 change ; if you do not I will take it. I will see in the 

 next number." — T. R., Philadelphia. 



I am in favor of enlarging your paper, and hope 

 that the answer in the March number will be favor- 

 able."— F. Z. G , McKeesport. 



" I think the plan an excellent one and worthy the 

 support and approbation of every collector in the coun- 

 try."— G. P. E., Mercer. 



" Am favorable to the enlargement or that daisy — 

 the Y. O."— R. H. I., Reading. 



" Hope you will get enough support to enable you 

 to enlarge it." — H. K. J., Manayunk. 



RHODE ISLAND. 



" You have my vote [to enlarge] ; I hope many 

 others will think the same as I." — H. H. R.; Westerly. 



" I think it would be a good plan." — J. M. S., 

 Newport. 



" Have the Y. O. a thirty-two page monthly by all 

 means. I will willingly pay my $1.00 for another 

 year and longer." — H. S. H., Providence. 



SOUTH CAROLINA, 



" I will pay the difference, 40 cents and be glad if 

 you enlarge." — A. J. D., Anderson. 



TENNESSEE. 



" I vote to enlarge the Y. O."— W. H., Shelbyville. 



VERMONT. 



" It would please me very much to see the Y. O. a 

 thirty-two page magazine. I wish it all success, and 

 will try to find time to contribute to it's columns." — ■ 

 C. O. T., Taftsville. 



" I think your proposition to enlarge the Y. O. a 

 very good one. Am willing and glad to pay one dol- 

 lar a year for enlarged copy." — C. H., Bennington. 



" I take the Y. O. and like it very much. I think 

 perhaps it would be well to enlarge it to thirty-two 

 pages." — J. W. L., Brandon. 



VIRGINIA. 



" Your proposition to enlarge the Y. O. is an excel- 

 lent one, and I will be glad to see it out in it's new 

 form. Why not illustrate it ?" — J. B. U., Fork Union, 



" For one I am glad to advance my subscription 

 40 cents and enlarge the Y. O. Let us have a thirty- 

 two page magazine on May the first." — L. B. F. , 

 Richmond. 



" I am in favor of the Y. O. being enlarged, and will 

 try and get some subscribers." — W. D. R., Fredricks- 

 burg. 



■' I think I will take the Y. O. this year whether 

 you double the number of pages or not. lam a con- 

 stant reader of it." — H. D. W., Richmond. 



WISCONSIN. 



" It is my opinion that it would please every sub- 

 scriber to have it enlarged to 64 pages or still larger or 

 a good plan would be to let it be just as it is and make 

 it semi-monthly. I will do all I can to support it." — 

 W, F., La Crosse. 



" I am in favor of having Vol. 2 of the Y. O. a 

 thirty-two page magazine." — M. C, Eau Claire. 



'■ I am in favor of making it 32 pages." — H. B. W., 

 Clinton. 



" Hope you will enlarge your paper as contemplat- 

 ed. I think It is well worth a dollar as it is, and 

 intend to renew my subscription at any price." — V. 

 M. S., Milwaukee. 



" I think one dollar cheap for such a paper and am 

 willing to pay it. Will renew my subscription when 

 you decide." — C. H. D., Sharon. 



" I for one am willing to pay extra if the Y. O. is 

 enlarged to a 32-page paper ; as it now it, it is invalu- 

 able to the collector." — E. B. C, Rubicon. 



CANADA. 



" I for one will be most happy to make my sub- 

 .scription one dollar instead of sixty cents as formerly ' ' 

 T. J. H., Gait 



" I would very much like to see the Y. O. enlarged 

 as it is a capital paper for amatears, and even older 

 collectors find many records of interesting observa- 

 tions in it." — W. D. S., Montreal. 



KIND WORDS 



For The Young Oologist, Hand-Book, &c. 

 '■ The data blanks you sent me are first-rate, the 

 best I ever saw ; the paper is good and does not blot 

 through as was the case of those I formerly received 

 of . 



The caliper, after experience and practice is alj 

 right for small eggs — cannot expect anything more 

 perfect for the price." — E. R., Nazareth, Pa. 



We have received from the publisher a copy of the 

 Oologist's Hand-Book. This is one of the most 



