REMAINS, FROM ARKANSAS AND LOUISIANA. 187 
MEASUREMENTS OF THE LOUISIANA CRANIA WITH REFERENCE TO THEIR SIZE 
Circum- 
Museum Cranial ference Nasi трие 
ты | Locality Sex [Deformity el Capacity | (206048 | wa opisthion | parietal 
diameter) қарға осы, arc ле 
tal ridges) suture) 
с. € cm, cm, . . 
255.094 Harrelson Landing Female --- ? ? Ж 36.9 nic 
095 | we ys ----- 1370 15,40 50.0 37.0 4-“ 
.107 Myatt's Landing Male — ? 51.7 36.4 4-7 
.114 js " ---- 1545 15,63 51.7 36.0 46 
.102 | k: ~ o. c. ? ? ? -6 
104 | у ~ же ? 15.13 49.3 33.6 5-7 
106 | 8 МЕ E 1420 15.37 49.7 34.3 -4 
111 | > s ~ 1390 15,23 | 48.5 34.8 5-7 
115 »» | e 2 1: | 15.30 49.3 34.7 5-7 
‚118 T Female | —— ? | 15.13 49,7 36.0 45 
116 га ла ? | 14.67 48,7 35.0 3-6 
‚103 š 2 о. с ? | ‚60 48,0 38.2 8-5 
.105 ЫН án " 1410 | 30 52.2 36,2 5-7 
112 | ps e px 1390 | .28 50.: 35,0 5-7 
„ИТ. | Yn | хи T ? | 0 49.: 33.8 3-5 
„118 | бх я: % ? 18 | 493 | 988 4-7 
.154 | Jones Landing | Male - 1560 | 93 | 516 | 385 5-7 
203 | Bray Landing | Маје | — ? | OT UAI | ) 4-5 
204 | T | “ | سے‎ | 1580 | 8 | 512 | 359 ћ 
.201 | 57 | "1. 6,0 | 180 | 1500 | 608, 37.2 5-6 
.202 | 2 | Female | “ |? | 16.17 | 500 35.7 45 
.207 | Mound Landing | Female | — ? | 15.00 | 479 | 338 4-6 
211 | ard Place | Маје | — | 1470 | 15.70 | 510 | 366 4-7 
.209 | ү Есе Oe ; | ? |] 9, | жаз 46 
210 | ois | Зи f-o.c 1420 | нае“ | ? 4-5 
.215 | +: Зи Е 1400 | 15,67 51. 36.0 5-8 
217 | 4 da о.с 1440 15/0 49. 34.4 4-7 
918 " "ob m | 1350 ? 49.6 ? 5-6 
218 | 4 | Еетаје | -- | 1216 | 14.60 | 47.2 34.3 5-7 
.208 | y Db--* | go | HP | 149 | 47.0 33.4 45 
.212 "° | ten E Въ 1330 | 1463 | 473 33.3 4-6 
214 ze: | и. INVE 1390 | 14.70 | 47.6 33.3 45 
216 " аға E 1325 14.97 | 480 | 38.5 46 
.219 i | T u ыы | ? | 14.60 па | 4-6 
990 as | елен | f. | MM | ET | Y 3-4 
| | 
ж O. с. = occipital compression ; f-o. с. = fronto-occipital compression. 
The relation оҒ the capacity to stature, the latter represented by the length of 
the femur, was determinable in 7 of the male and 5 of the female skulls from Louis- 
iana, and the results are given in the following table. The relation, it is seen, is 
not without its variations, but it should prove of considerable interest when estab- 
lished in large series of skeletons. 
The number of Indian specimens available is not satisfactory for a comparison 
of the capacity-stature relation with that in whites; nevertheless, by including the 
data on the Arkansas skulls given in the previous section and accepting 33.3 ав 
the approximate average femoro-cranial index in white males, it is found that of 
twelve male Indian skulls only three show an index greater than that of whites 
of the same sex, while in nine it is lesser. In all probability a lesser femoro- 
cranial index than that of whites exists throughout among the Indians, though 
there will be individual exceptions. This means that the well known lower aver- 
age cranial capacity of the Indian is not due to smaller stature. 
The cranial module (mean diameter) and the measurements of circumference 
