РскмвЕЕ 21, 1861,] THE GARDENERS' МЕРКИТЕ yea n сс 1128 
| biri ed сүз under 
soon polen to be felt. Litigation ot the most expensive ring | ргевеп nt таза ; апа it may very fairly be urged, that the vacui 
Paris Union Settlem —The last|and carried on with the most bitter feeling, eee to an | ing of the ak of MA. causing the absence of the servant 
i La this time e master, 
ly y meetin ng af the рл for f et was held on =з р a i sci ber te cdi ў 1 adis 
day evening , at the Club House, Blackfriars, |in the kingdom can bear witness to the injurious operation of | institution of the mop fairs, against which there is anoh a 
numerously de The chair was bmi this Act. The poor were continually harassed, and prevented | strong feeling at present. These continual breaks m 
f tk Ir. Skelton. The =ске from getting their li tzt in an ^ way ; and from contribu- | necessity have tended very much to the weakening ot ü that t 4 
an of the year, Мг. { 2 ting, by their labour, to the general commonwealth. This state | wbich ought to exist between the employer and the employed ; 
consideration, which was cg ced by Mr, i of things soon began to tell on the rates, which were quad- | and A is feared tha it its effects are yet visible. In 1846 the 
wy, of Sil i а г 
the card in the fi * | 
rms: * Would it tbe "advise to tnis mini History of the Poor " (page 266) we have a — айу of | James. raham's eh was passed. This first established the 
i e оо » 
it b 
T substitute сеч settlements e NM average of the years 1788, 1784, 1785, Pind the Ton ш р д ОСЕ bar and produced a most remarkable 
After a few opening r marks from the | under 2 26th Geo. IIL, c. 56. I subjoin a portion "r^ this RE Ud law of quoa and at x stroke abolished 
analys о} 
d, Һаѕһад t ficial t thelabo 
радиа the "my a fem aar expenses of overseers in journeys, attendance on be ow а а) - Men e ingenia e ^ 
on, 1 my кагы P en а few magistrates, &c. :— B sd. 
mind Af the Ac 
er £24,493 18 especially for its object tho, relief of the irremovab r 
согар oÙ the zainda Modium expenses of entertainments at meetings lin to espec Of fio ooi ‚Мен fand of ins Кода ed € ро 
E the poor— A u n "X wherein such poor y^ pened then tọ be . 
Aem Un ad 2и гаа t of us remember the introduction of this measuxe 
е .. infe. bf respective unions, and I may add, in my own eaae, 
tons! GA the dificult in э prt тыт (өл its готів sions. Опе effect 
re intended to remove | Medium expenses of law, orders, examinations, and other pro- - cerkately been ма -— di, >ч мр2 i qo 
the à Poo Sue m ooediogs. LO to the emm ч „ to 
tar mri cere bue; and dis — n : EES of such poor from their own pow to the 
Dm TRET . 2,0383 11 “ common charges ;” and the Ж Шәлөө of the board gene- 
rally is necessarily called to this subjee 
£55,791 2 6 
Y during tho Modium of money expended in setting the poor bo "een Parish or Union Settlem "dd RA. ы thus taken а 
rendre England wiped Aia MEM AMOR | glance at some o! aiias arious enactments on the Law of 
allo wed t to кыза e ui s) ape glue capiet Settlement, I will proceed to the ыдын un of the 
10 | subject as it comes before us, viz., Would it be advisable 
expen 
portance, ali ош s peng Е роого ры d д xx e iln e werben in | agrieultural or Ls р 
= ourn: 
Мар an * d A à | entertainments at -— and 55,791. in expenses of For m growing 
allowed to drop for | orders, exam 
address 
n From this it appears, that while only 15, 8021 
of law been а "gi 
mination. E аак ргосеейй relative to the | that tho pre p Prosent 8, е? Ф вЫ x ret E 
cuu чти Pa , at such items of | unjusi e ratepayers e 
M A | al Its immediate pria as rds ie de 1 to 
DAC. 
er 
hes, termed open ones, b: 
——— me enables due em ir Fe 
contrary, the Жан" close parishes, and pro 
ended as a subject for e. | m 
Mc TIE ex 
Tieri — ga eariy period > =? pom Ваз if misfortune, Bing mati 
E ЕЕ by Kapao lapse of Aen d mm eel k became t ablo to re 
its origin d be an —— e| ЫҢ, operi 
ЕСН xS A DU MEE the A ure introdu de by hase dem oF 
е n imself to so 
EE 
me burgh or diatric paupere away from t their о 
ry measures à 
„Еа statute of Elizabeth soon 
arles II. witnessed the intro- 
must. This tie acts upon the labourer ап@ re-acts 
of | employer. The former; knowing his resource, will not strive 
to get a bare living; while the latter, impressed with the 
eir 
‘Te 
s upon locomotion реа 
кее = restored them. 
oyers and their men 
| Teis mot that either is in fault. The fa is in the system, 
4E сеч gio Сейде, — were binds the labourer to the soil 
2 ~ ent. present inequality of wa, 
de |to some extent be traced to “ет, — for, Tike pin- omer 
eeply | ren labour will oh p cheap im proportion 
Жуз supply and demand. 
E Im: be proportionat 
ent asa Nepre just within the bounds | botter remuneration ; and it may be said that he is A matu- 
X^ be mentioned, but not discussed, | rally of a migratory disposition. The answer to this would be, 
in support of the r that hitherto no ptm ортону has posi) ao тей 
opinion upon the bim. Taught from his you look upon his part аз 
| bis aona, he ааа доот aom ре 
А 0 
i esum w соте to consider the ETT pep AM төрм be. de- 
Es. of 1594, TA Acl at which most of : ameter eris uomen 17$ 
"under which, with few modifications, we 
De of the « vis a (Ж he were to ^ 
Eat aro” tar to De charge that there were several ín that parish 
and he eould not employ strangers. — 
1 to , 1t would be tomu мо say that that Act'h MER 7: 
Inhabit, by oM Xo refiové n the for which it was intended; at the same time rcg жеу 
"Or persons to suc meri ideis he or they were eannot be denied that it was a v. beneficial me measure, Bome ean be more depressing to а man and anxious 
od, either as а native householder; persone have remarked, ^T et ers h if it | work, than to receive such ; end no wonder 
о нум for the space of forty ad been properly admini » Drink n фы нч, je that im course of time be becomes uttery callous. 
E shall E sufficient se à dise know it broke n through administration, and етерге That such eases often occur there ean be no doubt, and for 
some alteration was necessary. For my own part, believe | the truth of the statement F m appeal to таву present. 
as showing чавга well-timed and well considered measure, and | I repent, this is not the faultof the master or man, but of 
ement. It would be out lacb| the law under which each is compelled to live. In many * 
into its provisions; | cases, however, the alteration of the Law of Removal а! 
nt connected with the subject| Settlement would about a very different state of 
It very much reduced the listofsettlements by abolish- would no longer be the fear of permanent 
of obtaining them. I believe the following | inoumbranoe if cottages lt for tbe occupation of 
st of settlements, тіл. ; setti labourers. mid then be free 
à The -— the arringe, settlement by parent- | кън ч ће 1 provide fer himself and his 
Sand as "strange p. with a cer! nt renticesbip. stlement by чак a family; and the idle or eremi labeurer would bave to 
and not retur roing when егч Ы emen tlement by e tlement by ochial bestir epe or he would find it very diffeuit to get ew- 
ч k while in the sn it shall not be а taxes. I will not take. u ае time in enlarging upo Зер as the шеш, ent that before existed to find 
mpared with the stat avery nor in following € of then through their various ramifica- | him M in bis parish had Bome persons have 
measure; but it continued in operation for many years, tions, but it would not be well to pass them over altogether, Loss Rt to alteration ы these laws, on the ground that it 
former, but for maladministration, might have been in exist- | To this Act we are indebted for the abolition of settlement by : wpset the parochial system. That system was 
