Jerr 6, 1861.) THE GARDENERS а AND AGRICULTURAL -GAZETTE 
uch admired some 10 years s E Lord | | After some discussion the mo as negat = ^ 
serbe ай оа the committal of the Subd of | Mr. CONINGHAM moved that he hus sium. э ‚бакачы "y s | for а" а — Е —— unless Еч ey жеге por- 
presion The Bishop of Іохром stated several са 4 the motion was again negatived by В [X Eton | Porson пеге was, however, no fund applicable to com- 
Bene Bül— that it should be with- | moved tha auy ea Locke | pensation for losses arising from m effect c 
and recommended that t the 4 Sd. sel ir c^ change of the 
tbe measure, ir ^ adjourne in this | law, except—assuming that а clai å be 
d of a more general nature for impro ing state of the question, D эй a doub Z^ 1 established —by a 
iem. and а scheme of оого im its stead.—Lord OveR- | of this motion had ade expressed a dou x w het aer "ie notice charge on the rates of the parish ; and this would be ug 
ессі law introdu - С А n given by Major EDWARDS. some Chu iurch-rate in other form. Under th À тч. 
s jn tbis recommendation. —The Duke of Maru- | debate this formal patur р was overruled by ње Qu 1 to be circumstances be 
тоз couc b that his noble — would not | Major pee teda ved the ad f pea ія duty, reluctantly, to oppose the motion.— 
somou expressed A arde Bad been made to іла в | Fr iday whi ob E c journment of the debate to | ond с REY said, — ehm cases of baráship had arisen 
unc great s re, they had тей fr 
CASTLE Bi E Mo рис. "iution У Sats (Sudbury and St. Albas's) | failure on the гре F1 the. Govern inh or the i 4 
il— "i "ihe Heport upon this Bill м. amended, Mr. Dux. | amendment having M rithdrawn the origin yo was 
the postponement of t question for three negatived on a -e л by 59 to 48. Poland.—Mr. HaswgssY 
g that the measure in 5 present form was | Called attention to t| — in M n with — to 
the House had sanctioned on the second | Treaties of 1815. He upon а long historical narrative, 
uld be better to abandon the Bill altogether | commencing with cg dite of Poland, of "the eat cate 
iml d a Mac v E tinkering т inconsistent dese DEDE reed the Poland an апд argutd that the 
esign.—Mr. SCULLY secon he motion,— | destruction of the independence of Poland —À epe ration 
Bi, the object о A ввел, said that no case had been alo en jo ә Rus ге паа eriall gem me thi da and, as 
money ex ill, three out of the four pro- | well as the political an A — 9 pontes 
deis K чөе m. a Fee Н galre ady m et with ith approval. Бесеп iss events in. Poland, c" poesi ed justified the House of 
Ты Marquis o! io mn ment, ап gued that | Commons in making an effort to serve the Poles, as some 
M фе ВШ were already in ooi —€—— E the Gov tw о blame for not taking a m iine stand atomement for the y eei of England. He moved for 
Settled Estates UE А ча lites on tho Qj ч upon the B | im its original Shape and declaring that pis Ms "ood А а —— p »ondence on the subject of Poland 
4 time. e 3 z in tha they. would appas al to AM try. in 1831 and 1832 I the Governments of Great Britain 
f HARDWICKE mo an | 0, i 
Rare: (Royal Navy) ВШ. —The Earl o ^ sion dm as negat ived| апа Russia.— Mr. Minxrs seconded the омор, = Lo 
ol merchant service should be | py 2 USSELL said that the х 
E great Napoleon felt it beyond his power 
qubjedtod to tbe same examination мл (0 cesa eee ar m clauso, pud E. d bafis titution E another enabling to oirean I. inde ndenoe 9 ot pa i ta Bvorything "n 
betore recei of у in favour of Poland was 
кт sid that the result of the amendment would be to [хуу а pledge that it edid consider | of done at the Congress ot Vionna; whatoror Lond Омў 
fetter the action of the Crown in the si = a sudden emer- - — УСЫН unl he argued that "ir meh TOME might have been able to ассо € X: entirely sot aside by 
gency. — e Earl of ELLENBOROUGH, — h navo oen dut in its | {епс cy were created, it would fairly represen educated | the landing of райт from the — ot Elba. and a foeli 
surprised that the M ра ДУ Аз o- z ind of tho country and be thorougbly уун e The | still ed in Russia — at Petersburg that Poland 
ducet beca se the Governm alrea number of кем whom E w ould eoe od nearly | she ld. not enjoy p ger pri А es. Не defended the 
er in Cou cet to do all tha " the measure ien д equal to the electoral body of Ox double that of the Uni- пона ent of this Fer ad om A charge of complicity in 
t. р was negatived woes a eer and the | versity of ^ and ijo Ms us trm m qr the treatment of the Poles. England, he said, had been alto- 
BU! went through committee. The Cork Infirmary Bill passed | i : Ж. ч С: the pus hostile to the partition of Poland. With regard to 
om committee. „—8їг Q. Mp ni i dot Scot- | Russia, he un ^; by delicacy and е v of any inter- 
— — Harbours Bill, which had jai t n be i one for the еседо on beha! ir 
ште ents had behalf . на ре not ot accomplish È the object, or be for the interests 
htthat|of Polar r hopes might be entertainel from the 
ан гота ri enlightenment aud mti He did 
t oppose the produetion of the м гает отед for.—After 
© Oficera fime Tho P yal | e өт Ару) hat f сен ks by Sir Н. Verx г. E Warre, and Mr. 
—The Mai Р d ЕЕ PALMERSTON said (Чч was no objection to 
" di that the 
п reri 
i Ni Se f iscount М» vore d Colonel SYK as impossible 
ose thg кїл, and Colone id breast not to admire 
coun down to 
h Ра friend, 
convenience could be expe 
PuipaY.—-Cosotidationof the Statutes, —The Lo 
mid that the A үе рг the irren jn of X Qe statutes ereed 
d rned 
he со 
otion was then to.—8Bir J. 
tention to the report Lot the Select Com- 
of 1860 ; and moved that, in the 
a | opinion of the deus, M it as the duty of her Majesty's Govern- 
take measures ы. ensure А all sea- а vesse! 
y those employed in the carriage of passengers, rs, shoul 
their lordships would ет рас the Bills вир 
pplied with €— р a properly tested 
posible. —Lord Bro! as to strength 1 and gae " мо омма 
the motion M. Олввох and en c 
ng oppoeed 15 
r 2: Mein p it would entail hie y Gov аянд. the 
an upon 
но — s Government, — aud deme! of not Е testide. but ofre Ae A 
Us ОЕ grants of m nstruct harbours of re anchors and chains of all merchant Mens which 
Раат. -0п the motion for going into Committee of Supply | that the e natural harbor rbours of refuge of this с load to m vn га yä: РЕ erence intolerable — owners: -— 
A Mr. pe called a attention to the | tained.—Mr. M. Gresox admitted the importance of maintain- BeN and Mr. HassARD варро orted the —8ir 
iio sed as the Garibaldi P a ing the тай i а ours of eim is es Е опе во commo- EY "wor * Opposed it The motion was vagi vei. ена 
ре the hon. us and c nt as Harwich. pr mised that the 
— Мг, BUTT сыа attention v? ul Derryveagh Evict 
Im к su Lou ^ nit resolution rour of institutin 
the existence of any society formed m MÀ Hona went Ito DUGMEIGS Of 
m à for the pur- 
g funds to assist a revolutionary party in any imates. Various votes were 
th which we are in я alliance is inconsistent | Vote of 20, 
principle of n — Lo i 
t 
cide transpired in 
uss 
or | tions of n hand, exclusive of 
be buil New Palace Arg 4 
clock-to 
o 
ed | portion 
of e 7 to 
r. dinori conosived then there 
an unders 
ааз 
reme d Qu ha harbour 
Metropolitan Police Force Pensions 
Industrial Schools (Scotland) Bill passed through commit 
were advanced а 
8E 
selec 
a ч S $2001 A proposed 'or the statues 
vote. This am ent was, ene 
'AM we: for the South Ki 
also discussed at some length, 
iii 
s Loi 
of the d 
go Court, Lr 
Mr. CARDWELL 
—€— -— dee ege 
TuESDAY.—At the morning sitting th 
i tsi y when protection t that т be thrown round them and 
Pug ATE n e jc атау а 
through ttee.— 
он stated, in Mart 
уеп- tervontion. T grand jury wes a рое dnd 
D, that | than a. to justice. 
"m 
К] 
ГИ] 
virg i іН 
ат 
| nili 
| | 
77 
ins 
ГА | 
1 
