408 ADDITIONAL NOTES, ETC. 



the locality having been made, according to the Flora of 

 that county. 



368. TrifoUum suhterraneum, vol. i. ]3. 293. 



Province 9 may be added in the area, on the two autho- 

 rities quoted in Dickinson's Flora of Liverpool ; but fur- 

 ther confirmation would be desirable. 



269. TrifoUum ochroleucum, vol. i. p. 293. 



The south limit should be traced in Essex and Herts 

 (or Surrey). It was given in "Kent (or Sussex)" on au- 

 thority of the Flora Tonbridgensis ; but Mr. Borrer 

 remarks " I suspect the insertion of this in the Flora 

 Tonbridgensis was one of T. F. Forster's mistakes. I 

 believe there is no authority for it in either Kent or Sus- 

 sex." The county of Surrey rested only upon old autho- 

 rity, until Mr. George Lawson very recently (Phytol. iv. 

 461) reported this species as found by himseK on Wands- 

 worth Common in that county; but reporting also T. 

 resupinatum and Scorpiurus subvillosus, so that perhaps 

 he only intended to mention the present species as an ac- 

 cidental introduction to the locality. It is also enumerated 

 in the Floras of Liverpool and Manchester, very probably 

 through errors on the part of Mr. Thomas Sansom and 

 Mr. Joseph Sidebotham. 



270. TrifoUum MoUnerii, vol. i. p. 294. 



According to the Rev. C. A. Johns (Phytol. ii. 907) this 

 " is found at intervals along several miles of the coast be- 

 tween Cadgwith and Kynance, and is as undoubtedly wild 

 as Statice Armeria, and in some spots quite as abundant." 



273. TrifoUum maritimum, vol. i. p. 296. 



Province (10) instead of (11) is given in the area; al- 

 though in the text which follows, the ballast hills of Tyne 

 are expressly mentioned. My specimens are from Somer- 

 set (Mr. Thomas Clark), Dorset (Mr. Ray, B. S. L.), 

 Essex (Mr. Varenne), and Monmouth (Mr. Purchas). 



