IV. 



186. — Elatinacese, 188. — Caryophyllaceae, 189. — Lina- 

 ceae, 235. — Malvaceae, 238. — Tiliaceae, 243. — Hyperi- 

 caceae, 245. — Aceraceae, 254. — Geraniaceae, 256. — Bal- 

 saminaceae, 268. — Oxalidaceae, 270. — Celastraceae, 272. 

 — Rhamuaceje, 273. — Leguminosae, 274. — Rosaceae, 

 330. — Onagi'aceae, 369. — Haloragiaceae, 377. — L}i.lira- 

 ceae, 383. — Tamariscaceae, 385. — Cucm-bitaceae, 385. — 

 Portulacaceae, 386. — lUecebraceae, 387. — Berberaceae, 

 391. — Grossulariaceae, 392. — Crassulaceae, 395. — Saxi- 

 fragaceae, 404. — Araliaceae, 421. — Comaceae, 421. — 

 UmbeUiferse, 423. 

 Appendix, page 465. 



Note explanatoiy of the resemblance between the 

 ' Types of Distribution ' adopted in this work, and the 

 ' Floras ' of Professor Edward Forbes, page 465. 



Note. — As the title-page of this volume bears the date 

 of 1847, the year of its publication, it may be proper to 

 mention that two-thirds of the volume was printed in 1846. 

 Such being the case, the indicated areas, census, limits, 

 &c. of the species cannot be considered as brought up 

 completely to the state of recorded knowledge at the close 

 of 1 846 ; although most of the habitats published in the 

 course of that year have been taken into accoimt with the 

 other data used in describing the distribution of the spe- 

 cies. On page 340, Potentilla rupestris is inadvertently 

 referred to the " Enghsh " instead of the " Local type of dis- 

 tribution." On page 379, the type (British) and region 

 (Agrarian) of Myriophyllum altemiflorum are omitted. 



