OF RADIANT HEAT THROUGH DIFFERENT BODIES. 25 
as the losses suffered by the rays in successively passing through the four 
plates of glass; it being carefully kept in mind that these values are not 
referred to the initial quantity, but to the number of rays which arrive 
at the surface of each screen. 
Thus the proposition of Delaroche is true as far as the third and the 
fourth screens ; for in the transition from one loss to another a dimi- 
nution of each loss is observable. 
It will have been observed that the losses were not so great in re- 
spect to the four equal layers of the screen of a fourfold thickness ; and 
that this should happen will be easily conceived if we consider that in 
the latter case there is a solution of continuity which causes a greater 
dispersion of the heat by reflexion. But we see that in both cases the 
difference between two successive losses becomes less in proportion as 
the distance from the surface, at. which the rays entered, is greater. 
Let us now proceed to consider the influence exercised on calorific 
transmission by the composition of the substance of the screen. 
M. Prevost had concluded from the experiments described in a me- 
moir already quoted, that water and glass ought to transmit rays of heat 
in different quantities ; for by causing the sheet of water to fall between 
the lighted candle and a very delicate air-thermometer, he obtained no 
indication of heat being transmitted unless when he had blackened the 
ball of the thermometer, and even then the increase of temperature was 
extremely small ; whilst a plate of glass substituted for the sheet of water 
produced effects sufficiently manifest*. But it was objected to him that 
the difference between the action of the water and that of the glass was 
owing to the conductible caloric which was perceptible in the latter 
case only. Delaroche subsequently observed that a square of greenish 
glass transmitted more heat than a plate of another species of glass 
perfectly pure. However, as the first flake was much thinner than 
the second, it was insisted that the difference in the effects was owing 
to the difference of thickness. At length, some time after the in- 
vention of the thermomultiplier, M. Nobili and myself made some ex- 
periments on olive oil, alcohol, water, and nitric acid; whence we in- 
ferred that water opposed a greater resistance than any of the three 
other liquids did to the passage of rays of heat emanating from a hot 
iron+.- But these experiments are to be regarded only as mere trials, 
tending to show the facility with which the thermomultiplier may be 
employed in all sorts of inquiries relative to calorific radiation ; for we 
did not take sufficient precautions to prevent the heat from passing by 
_ * His own words are: “It appears, therefore, that water does not allow so 
much caloric to pass immediately as glass does. At least it affords a passage of 
that kind only to a quantity of caloric more minute than that which passes 
through the glass.” (Mem. already quoted, § 48.) 
T See the note in page 4. 
