OcrozEr 27, 1860. ] 
THE _GARDENERS’ CHRONICLE AND AG AGRICULTURAL GAZETTE, 
THE HARVEST OF 1860—Continued. 
pn aT T 
| WHEAT. BARLEY. 
NTIES. | OATS. BEANS. PEAS. | POTATOES. | TURNIPS. | MANGELS. NAME AND 
ol hae | QUANTITY, QUALITY. QUANTITY. QUALITY, ADDRESS. 
—— 
ENGLAND. || 2 ¥ % 
RUTLAND ..|| Average Inferior Average Coarse Good Average Average a i Mag Not good Not good ucla Emping 
| aor be am 
NORTHAMP-|| Prob: Probably Probably | Not yetin y bad Griy, Oourkien, 
TON | ayera average average yie Hull 
her under |Much inferior Average Very ER Full average | Full average | Bare average | Not average Various Small J. ih Peter- 
average goo: ugh 
About average Reif inferior Average Very bad oe Full but out Very bad | Never so bad | Very bad Very bad |J. B. Smeaton, Naseby 
much hurt 
1-4th under bee’ = Fis 5th under | Much hurt 1-6th under | Over average | Half under Average; |l-3d of acrop| Halfa crop |P. Love, Northam 
average 1; Diaa average average average 2-3ds rotten F 
LEICESTER || Much under | Very inferior || Not quite |Underaverage Spring ride ‘ailure Very % Very bad |Under average|J. Buckley, Normanton 
average vera; goo 
WARWICK ..|| Under average under Good TO) Halfa crop | Much ries 1-3d of a crop} Late & small |J. F. Tulloch, Wroxhall 
average 
avera ge Various Ave E i average ; eased Under averago) Much under |W. Gi Stratford-on- 
quality Ea average Avon 
under | Thin and soft rage edium Very bad |All b Lo a total Fair .Ford, Newbold Pacey 
average ure 
Very deficient/Large propor-|| Full average | Stained but aes Pretty good |Cerain failure | Worst ever |Not qe: Bang J. Č. Adkins, Milcote_ 
on heavy soils wont ue fit dry known half a "| 
Very various an Various Not average 5 to 7 qrs. Failure Half diseased | Not 2 f T. Bowick, Kenilworth 
w Various |@enerally good Fair Half inferior Middling Very bad Never worse Failure Very bad_ |W. Aitchison, Coventry 
HEREFORD || Not average Inferior Average Various Average Good Sadly diseåsed| Not good Pretty good |P. ee Edwards, 
rinsop Court 
mshels | 621lbs. per |/40 bushels per Fair ots Saas Total failure Bad Very good Price, Ross 
er pe bushel acre [m 
Nòt average G Over average Good seas verage Diseased | Late; small Average |J. Mathews, Blake. 
MONMOUTH | 25 bushels per Damp 25 bushels per| Stained 30 bushels pêr ea Much diseased Leaves |5 ton per acre H. Pride, Monmouth 
acre acre acre 
Not deficient Various Good Injured Por bei ry ry poor Middling „ Abergaven: 
WORCES- Average Fair Good Rough issa Stron rong Fair ery iddling Fair RS Smith, Droitw 
TERSHIRE Average Good” Not average ood Average Not average Various Very bad Tota failure a good |H. Hudson, Tocca 
GLOU- 30 bushels per ood 50 bushels Good 60 bushels | 40 bushels Vario ae al alf crop o-thirds |T. Cobban, Whitfield | 
CES’ acro en 
ch undi Inferior Average EER ond Average Very variable Bulky „Halfa erop |Late and ani = |J.Coleman, È 
average washe on 
16 bushels per) Inferior — {/36 bushels per Good Good Very good Good Very bad .| One quarter J. N. Hulbert, Baget- 
acre acre (out) last year’s crop hasi 
Und ge M inferior)| Full average Injured Various (out) he g Very bad Inferior Not so good |—, ‘house 
crop; 
1-5th under. ry bad | Over average babs po Over average verage er wt AAN Bad Small 8. Rich, Didmarton 
average staine , soft 
254 quarters | -Inferior quarters | Much stained Average |Average (out) Various over b a Generally bad Not half a crop/@. Edmonds, Lechlade 
ever before 
20bush.p.acre.| Not good | 30bush. age Not good {/49bush. p.acre! Not good Blighted 2rd bad Various Good C. L. Denton, Coleford 
-OXFORD ....|| Not average | Indifferent Averag g Good; stained Good - Good Avera “Bad ee aver-| Average |R. tape. North New- 
: „LahA toO bus Inferior 32to 3t bush.} - Various ||Late; stillout| Good: out Good Much diseased) Light t Inferior |8. Dron, Eynsham 
coer per acre per acre 
WERKS......|| Not average Inferior Underaverage} Variable p and in- [goods bat jure Very bad {Late ani light General!y bad|E. W. Moore, Coleshill 
s p erior 00 but eet 
Deficient Inferior Average Stained it average ; ; goa, but Diseased. Good _ Good E. J. Lance, Reading 
Eee Pi > s 
Not average Damp Average {30s. to 50s. per|| Very ees In field very bad Not good | Half a plant |F. Fordham, Newbury 
quarter Á 
3 qrs, per acre} Light and 43 qrs. per i 7 qrs. per RS qrs. per acre a qrs. per Bad Small; weedy Small J. Adnams, Thatcham 
iana damp Sree RES Cot Rage pee iji Bad alfa. crop.|J« Williams, Abingdon. 
-3 E LEET TESS ona - : ’ 
3 qrs. per acre! Variable || Over average | Much hurt Excellent - |Good but late} Good, but | Very bad Bild: Smail Generally bad|T, Owen, Hi 
"pike z J never worse 
t a 
BEDFORD . ee od mucha Very variable || Very various Inferior 6 qrs. per acre Good cnp, but| 5 quarters Inferior Bad —, oeii 
reshe : “ 
BUCKES...:...|| 34 quarters |Average dampi} 5 quarte: Inferior 7 quarters jotia sss. Claydon 
Average Inferior Full average}. Very bad Average Over average aie nats a But re average’, F. ‘Eyans vans, St Wee 
Average Raw Average Tolerable © || Not average PEA t; ar pee at Woda a Ara Under average mean, Brad- 
HERTS ......||Under average| Various Under average Cangas Average Vera gota Not average Badly diseased Light Light G. Webb, St. Albans 
stain 
ds inferior || 3 -4ths ofan | Half injured Average |Fair; still out} 3d deficient “Wretched Very late Various |—, St. Albans 
average z 
HUNTING- Eon Not v i Good Very good arious {Much ight cróp ight P. Purves, Bram] 
DON 
AMBRIDGE |8 bushels defi-| 2 stone per s&t reti Good generally Good Good Good- deal Wa A. S. Ruston, Chatteris 
SHIRE sient coomb below Ge diseased 
average i 
NORFOLK ..! 4 bushels defi- Inferior Good Good Good Good if Very bad; Generally Small W. Cubitt, North Wal- 
cient never worse light sham 
faverage | Very inferior || Not average Various Not average (Good ; still out! Fair ; injured | Total failure |Small and late} Half a crop_|T. Brown, Denver 
6 bushels defi- tmuch -|/6 bushels defi-|. Coarse and | B: age Good ; Damaged | Never so bad | Fair Swedes |3-4thsofa crop W.H. Taylor, Wymond- 
cient complaint cient stained ham 
SUFFOLK ..||8 bush. under |Bad condition || None uch very Average Quite average; Not average | Very bad B crop (L. O. Collingham, 
ge black Saxmundham 
eeey per Damp 2 to 4 grs: Not fit fc resá ss Diseased Very Poor G. Edwards, Fram- 
malting lingham 
ESSEX aeres Damp tore — and || Indifferont Soft Bad Bad Fair ; late Small Hardy & Son, 
an 
Deficient Bad os on Injure Average Good; still out saat Very bad Not good Not good |W.F. Hobbs, Colchester 
ight land urt 
Very poor 4 quarters | Good; early 6 quarters 5 quarters Good ; but Very bad Not good Improved |W. Hutley, Witham 
carried much. lost 
84 qrs. Half injured 4 qua: Half good Over average Average Half crop None | 1-4th crop Half erop |C. Hall, Narestock 
22 bishta per Damp Paan m 86 bushels per, Partly good Bad Failure | Bad crop Not half |J. J: Mechi, Tiptree 
acre | 
Not : cerid arbi Poor crop | Very variou TAN |Fair; still out| Tolerable very bad | Bad Bad A. Barfield, Dunmow 
Not average Vari Over average fed "ante Very good | et i crop; | Much hurt Nothalt acrop) Not good Small |W. Manser, Ramsgate 
standing still out 
Much ‘under |40s. to 7 -3d fit for sa Partials O. , seased.,.... Halé. -Halferop |R: Matson; Wingham 
average quarter’ malting 3 í í aar 
Halfa crop |Thinand light; Nearly aver. Vario Nearly 3 EST Nearly all | Very much Bad Generally : H. Hayward, 
|f Much under | Light || Under average) Inferior || Damaged stillout| Next to Small f Verysmall |J. Brotherton, Hurst- 
HANTS Tie risd _ aie 1-4th injured aoe 1-4th injured | Full average; Full average ;/ Worse than | Good; small Small We Romsey 
“t Various Average Various ae half ; Ay eatable | Very bad Small Sader eee. Win- 
Not average Soran Half d piesis Very good A Small Small |H. Raynbird, Basing- 
a stoke EST 
Eoi y iege h Half a cro, 3 
bushels per| Inferior | 30 bushels per| Irregular shels p ls per |26 bushels per Not morethan S riks A 5 neey 
s acre Ao hi 
DORSET ....!| pen er | Very light: |iover average uch good || Full average snp, reat fail ery light Damen, Dees gd 
j ae Foul and~ {Fouland wr 7 y 
ee Very inferior verage (Much injured ood sae Average; hurt} Very bad e Di Seon $ 
g j A w > pate 
20 oe Variable || 8 to 12 sacks |3-5ths ‘stained Good vows Spoilt Very bad verage Small pbe ater- 
| Very bad + J. Pope, 
8 sacks short | Very bad ood Good Good Unnsually ba ery 1-4th of a J. 
i gacka oti yore pi sree i Sa 5 fot ait har | Good; still Bad Never so bad cs bad crop minster s 
report ae pc Very . W. Eastment, Win- 
SOMERSET.. a bushels per| Middling 32 bushels Stained és Good; still out wave Nee bet 1 ‘gua crop ton, 
