Decemper 8, 1860.| THE GARDENERS’ CHRONICLE AND AGRICULTURAL PAAT 1087 
rather than to its facts. And the only case bearing on Flats in Somersetshire—now exist, each Commissi or 
it, agording tothe defendants’ ean ras adi g t dde Tta hetl should be paid for 
Ba cs and tdo one another, tk ld t 
by Lord pp aem if the lo 
surcharged a 
rabbits upon it. mon 
should be totall y eaten or destroyed, though the 
oe. coud t eee ane aid = he had a right 
as be n persons having |? 
| 
uch an extent ae. Saa hi piney goer ‘ee fee | 
s alue of no fncondidernble proportion of the | wi 
land hee their control. 
The evils arising from river obstructions are much 
more likely to remedy themselves, or to be o overcome 
ha 
ascortained, 
mtry 
PF 
c The whole case 
ving and compensation 
would issue an order, 
nec 
aks E and 
taint at existing see districts, under Commissioners, 
But hare. the pouts, ies no 
Mag im by t the 
eo Joh fall 
to maintain the necessary 
pas E 
t not be supposed that no legal means exist 
aa 
t m 
obtaining the object. There are several Acts, for 
‘or 
of tian fe tre espass committed by the 
+ j = Bis; 
5 re 
S, and t Put i A Majesty eT the ar h of Lord | Elgin into Pekin 
exiii. : 1: 
exiii. 
, 10 & 11 Vic., cap. xxxviii. ; 10 & 11 Vic., cap. 
> 
E 
FER 7: Wt 
will nder 
2& a Bii , cap. xci., | sec, 78; and 16 & 17 Vi 
liy. 
trap he crops. 
it tin the i ne ge a the increas è of the g 
t be so a influenced have su 
one, the defendants might = brought stood when it is stated that erita and "drainage ing 
within the terms of Lord MANSFIELD’S dic are blended and outfalls canalized, and when it ‘is ‘passage of dining ter, but, the trutt be told, 
‘The Judge . d the question of the stodiing of see o dikteict—-the l ftl 
the game might oe te ie to the j The — hich the 
> “ Eaubrink Cut saie spendin; He 0002. in obtain- + 
lease did not g right to set hei for The ing eight. Acts of tr spen to Z make and amen cl moi ira ig hardly possible to conceive a more im 
other purpose than for "the taking of el oe the point of seeking another Act to repeal the! which oddi ugh, ad “Tord «Lincoln's. 
question wai whether there was evicted i to re | ch is, y enoaghi siela oF ee 
whole, and, to use the w of Mr. La > a oal, pas os L whieh, alelough pued i in 1847, 
g of traps on the farm, or whether there | Elton, one of the first euthorition on the drainage of | m, fortunate 
7 resulting : from it, and whether the “to establish a system K en ancy Bee es res ate 
were e in accordance with the present sta’ .” found ! In fac ‘ee 1 ari that hes 
er evidence on these poin s had bee Wa ter-mills are gradually becoming sf eh, yet accrued ra aa e faeces ios aei Ae je the 
ee os retir ed, and in 20 este returned Lith and therefo ore less dante in oppontion Mini as powers given b a several Acts specified, 
a verdict of 251, for the plaintiff, half t prg. at E xP E or that w resulted from the knowledge that such 
til convinced o ‘of i : , and coul 
claimed. concession, at at period is not far distant. The seal bow AG wa s same iS 3 pite 
5 — “ Ca we idge we aest arri o e of a ore readiness i pee ting g the ood Sone bal of Hey day, ci and a “having be the pu ocoed; 
sop ploug. ately manufacti y Messrs, | < ings. any Jandowners, , Raving been mio 
r of the tence of the tion have at 
Howarp eran nein ina te sae As s " many many thousands of acres rendered un- a the ie 2 i yi am Z ho 
i r 
he 
f wd pd by mill: heads and dams than all the ar; 
ments of TE uie Railways have not sily 
a the and turnpike 
urists. 
successfully 
har them. It will be understood how inappropriate 
17 
e from rivers, canals, 
f T'E 
| all the forms and expenses of proceeding “have to be 
The valle that oso the teats 
of „the miller. 
ps ngly grace ed the p> dsea) e when viewed 
so pleasin 
throngs a neighbour's field (Phish ; as before stated 
fr’ p epod instead of harm), uired in the 
roads, are no 
s iiia a circumstance which i needless to state 
| im ne ae a mode transit aid pproack, detract- 
rl very considerably from the mille rofit, 
y ann legislative facilities are i 
claimin, H b 
~ | miller, i 
one side, and | will 
as fast going into di isuse, „Fen sO 
now, ae Gikan of th d 
ploughing were retarde A in | mi 
by the bo aapemeg of the 
? 
ares pos sian H i ma bh our ~ Be 
ompensating 
ice for the ealoulation: pe 
In the et n 
S, an 
eeking a comprehensive measure dreih al 
the ©. objects, great AS small, We seas in arter: 
drainage ; the; oz e lawyers in cluding counsel, 
5 and 
_ Howanm 8 new fen plough | Par 
of our co orre- | 
_ Roson; ; and the follow- 
and uncompro- 
ing is a repor ort of its 0 ope: expected from 
“ A man with a f ho. andi 
first, turning the soil to. 
sure Com- | 
f a 
silos iien as the Lands Clause: 
Act, hich 
the | an 
hat vey a pe 
it it follows, therefore, thai 
ti basging Bi 
y eining cost ost of proje 
y passing FEG an n ostato for several 
t, that no ʻo, paag 
i TA afford t ray: bey para on the outlay ; 
an owner for life is 
t will be Jopik ura 
under 
the 
pei number of = the powers afforded him 
the Acts specifi unt to a negative, 
ed am 
anaes A 
ur readers for 
ohne | 
. A single e sug- 
loughed even 4inches 
ae a knowledge of fen gestion | 
traordinary depth | simple ob 
uccessfully too, and | should b 
this. Pi naihain in 
soils mt scarcely conceive 2 that such an ex 
ects ot which I have confined m 
could be attained; but it was done, and su th 
e 
t 
, will sented yo the ful 
that a necessary powers for effecting the | 
my advocacy 
| ine 
directed “to 
maintained by the pron, dine 
be 
the highways for the time pen ä mesi be no 
hfare 
np or 
al k 
“A 
eeenne 
por bio health 
as a public e or road. “thoroughfare. It may be 
hath 
positely 
i a to The Tadom Commission as the best 
for dispensing any further general Acts 
one + i the voces & improvement of la land. 
what 
hould fall on the parish Ser or upon the occu- 
Aa 
J 
ra sr) 
cleanse and scour 
3 
ed to 
my Baroy T. Iv 
E Aa a 
t 
heir lands abut ; but there can be no doubt on the 
i t 
to the Commissioners and the mode ie which t they | 
should be exercis ed. 
I. 
A 
at the land, as in 
| range water chien neighbouring lands. In many 
; e famed. coms is to be obtained by 
m aaie the nei; Pouring owner 
OUTPALLS.—No. IIL sly ak gly bb ties 
use the removal of rinted oie 
g has tien made 
sdtg rs, that | Act o 
more deat ol Object, 
is unappre jated. No 
can have fi 
In either oi 
for it, in which machiner 
his 
b; 
uld not be given, that the powers eg the Commis- injured 
d be 
proper person to 
| the necessary works of clearing and main’ 
r rights of passage of | are done 
jit is therefore suggested that instead of attempting 
to bring into force the cumbrous and expensive 
Riis i a ix ay 3 xxxviii, 
sailed to 
spiky, and aa a exerted. 
culable loss to ahs. hekin at I: 
ced to the prejudicial effect of 
at the 
f, 
Com: mmissioners 
1i PER PER p 
sioners woul 
is suggested 
rge, <a 
Smead 
j boat, upon a | cases 
widening, an 
SAN oa would i involve the 
such 
tly or indirectly c 
taking of addi 
investigate the facts of the case ‘aroegh the medium | | land, and an tht the Ta with private eae it is 
of an 
he rae | Commissio 
facts o 
v have failed > necessity s- g re onlay eije 
hich n this | 
Holde: arna in Youk.| 
E Likeolneiiees Hunting- | 
, and the Bridgwater | 
his opinion upo: 
rer direc 
rainages under Local Acts, rt n the 
> wed the Bin soma condition in pisos nt, and the objecti ons raised t 
breadths of c 
shire, cam e great 
untry—such as 
Fen- invoke in t should be granted, and should 
Aonshire, and Cambri ridgeshire, Traction surveyor” (if the Assistant- 
| 
appoint an “able 
ee 
in the te Ta 
should thi allie decide | easement thro eats eig! Botin and, dir 
pe aa ld i final order to the surveyor of the highway who ot ea 
| see that the necessary works are properly executed by 
