THE GARDENERS’ CHRONICLE AND AGRICULTURAL GAZETTE. [Avevsr 11, 1860. 
oo nn mme Sm nts r- PEE PETTE YC BLT Cl nnn y TET E TE a 
In f June 27, has arrived | Borovom giving no! tiso of his eae (as), Lata u Statuse pate vy Bs other redone ig an of vinr was the obli- 
stage. The Local Governmen ci 85 mendmen ill was on of honour resting upon us to carry out the treaty wi: 
but ‘the news isha S meaty saticipsted by the last mail:— ar j a third time and passed. Th port of amendments on | France. Further, as papier of S, his proposal piber 
Caleutta.—The brace and a for the current year is | the Tramway ys (Irena). Bill ed Drought up ahd ‘egtead to. The | test the real oe and convictions of the present 
9,000, 0002, nearly 2,000, ore than had been expected. arena Commission Bill w: ad a pe sonra ime, aftersome House of Commons in regard to that system of come 
r. Harington had re-i forse i Jouncil a Bill to effect a | discussion on the powers of the ton issioners in regard to mercial legislation os triumphing over all resist- 
general disarming of all classes of Europeans as well as of the Pont increase of the rte of the Dean of York. The | ance, had now beco established in this country, and 
atives, b d met with such opposition that it had = Rifle Volunteers Bill passed through committee. The Industrial | presented a noble example to the world. There were also 
postponed for a week, and would no doubt be gr Museum (Scotland) Bul was read | a third time and a passed, The | considerat rp of justice to particular classes and interests, 
1 Outram had returned his trip to Singapore itl Ls na and Improvement of Land (Ireland) Bill was read a third | which would suffer n ot ‘only under the legislation of foreign 
Jay: o when he left, and his d passed, Some other Bills were Faetehar n x% te countries, ar under our own, unless the committee thought 
departure for England could not be delayed further. pect —Public Business.—Earl GRANVILLE said, in a fit to adopt the resolutions. With regard to treaty obligations, 
Bombay.—Some of th wany native gentlemen of y mectiiy to the Earl of DERBY, that the Go ga intended to pr mech ceed the treaty with France contained an absolute and indis- 
have petitioned the Legislative Council against the me- | with the Lien and Freig hts wg but i ne ee strongly patie i oberg without reference to whether one or the 
tax, cod -n ground ofits tendency to ta cilpas the poorer solaski, objected to the Bill they w ead r party was or was not disposed to carry it out, whieh 
Madras.—Sir Charles ae rke ad bis Pw ngland | could not speak youl sitiv aly’ | fwi ith fete roneo Pio other bout soit hove pote execution of its provisions. The 
on the "path June, in the Byela Ea a vast © of spec- | Bills, but the Government intended 2 a case to e had sanctio: that treaty, and had entered into a 
proceed with the Tenure of Land ae A Bill.— epee engagement T take the Sata necessary to give it 
Lord REDESDALE protested against the AA A m = effect. But it was said that this was done on the understand- 
present —— Poor tee terse Bill. ae rd pie ing that the Snes Somes would remit their export 
tors, and amidst the most marked dem MonycAisie pat respect. 
In M the Presidencies sympathetic meetings had been held, 
addresses voted to him on bing departure from India, pe 
rr were compose: wok Eg of natives, and w eti ed the ond ri Bill.—Lord R. rete E | duty on rags. The French Government had done their best 
most enthusiastic charact sed it pa ing. 7} toaccomplish that object, but unfortunately the protectionists 
- a ad been too strong for the ho the House would not 
SS asa Gabe = U Sl ha Ns. afford any encouragement to those monopolists, but that it 
Parliament. ag AY e Savoy Conference,—In to Lord J. M. i : nt 3 
NERS, Li ASEA Buor said that. her Majesty’ a at had | writers in France who were endeavouring to introduce the 
penos to a conference on the affairs of Savoy, but that Austria | great principle of free trade into that country. That rage 
and Russia had hea ert ome the ground that they saw no adyan- | were cheaper in France than in England was not a fact, for we 
tage likely to acer’ t, and, unless they withdrew their | exported more rags in one year than we could get from Franc 
objections, some ther poten tems 2 must be made. State of | if the export duty were removed. As to postponing legislation 
Syria.—Mr. Ricu brought aie motes he papra respecting | on the subject, nothing could be more impolitic than to keep so 
the disturbances in Syria, and inquired Fs t steps the Govern- | large a branch of poetry suspense. Onthe ground, therefore, 
ment intended to take with teferende tothe present emergency. | of humanity toa werd sane it would be well to have the 
—Sir J, Fercusson said that although the Christians had been | paper question se pap r m: urer 
me sufferers, they were not eien lame, = that the recent | no teal S ma ore ~ complaint “on the other hand, he had reason 
utbreak was attributable, n degree, to their conduct. | to be speci i eign 
Sar. S. FITZGERALD ri recommended that, if we interfered 1 in the aks nties w: aes oti in respect of his machinery, chemicals, and 
internal affairs of Syria, great care should be taken |all other combos ies ernie for the production of paper, 
not to dimimish the Rathoray. of the Sultan.—Lord Joun | the British papermaker had no such disadvantages to contend 
RussELL explained the arrangements which had been made st. Having pore at some length to the special grounds 
tho eA a ma and stated that the Henne st degree of | of exception urged by the British manufacturer, he concluded 
ai in | by expressing vomis that the House of Commons 
HOU “OF F LORDS. 
nee BAA o Bishops.—Lord DUNGANNON here 
E 
m,e 
Be 
ee 
Be 4 
B tg 
3 
ga. 
Pa 
es 
BS 
+ 
Pe 
0, 
'g 
oO 
© 
Bs 
ee 
eee 
< 
®© 
a 
Bos 
Lal 
oc 
BE 
ge 
Bo 
S 
p 
i 
4 
SEP aS 
oe 
Ege 
a 
© 
g 
° 
eo 
B 
S 
© 
2 
i=] 
a 
° 
S 
° 
eo 
A 
& 
2 
= 
93. 
4 
© 
R 
OQ 
or 
= 
© 
[ad 
S 
p 
or 
a 
£ 
or 
cs) 
p 
x endment “that wi 
position on the part of the Porte to show any lenity to him desiring to prejudice the sirai ‘of x reduction at a fate 
Mr. Bricut said that no intervention a be so RA excused ere of the vaata duty on books and paper, this committee 
as that proposed in Syria, which was of the character of | does not think fit at present to assent to such reduction,” He 
an ae AEE Py a police force than Dy a body of pane for | contended bos? regard being had to the capital embar! 
a political object, and he a oped the cı os taken at a sag h the paper and the number of persons PARAPAN in it, 
Gueersment in in at ges atter would lessen the dis s to Parliam Pi oo sot justified in making so important a change 
intentions. He protested, "hnrager, RH Eo the anai of ape as that opr Matte previous inquiry before a select com- 
fering in support of a Power like Turkey, which was doomed to | mittee. — Mr. LDERS, Mr. Crosstey, and Mr. MARSH 
fall to Paisomnsr ea m decay which it was piia a w EE. peg the resolutions, Mr. pee and Mr. 
Waid that Mr. bao. sata pav me ited oppone them,—Sir Hues Carrns denied that the How 
sani Although i ees ust be | was bound to the resolutions eo by the provisions ‘of 
Sea ths wring Turkey up toa TAN with t the civil ised PREAS of | ihe. treaty or by the principle of free trade. The 
Europe, his opinion was that if Turkey was left to herself she | division of the argument by the Chancellor of the Exchequer 
deliberations had been posesel phic ed at Paris aon ths 
to the effect that a force not ex: ing 12,0 pean tro would not fall to pieces. — of Sel. —In epl” to Mr. | was suspicious, “for, if the — was bound by the sae renty, 
should be sent to Syria, of which France would immediately | GRIFFITH, Lord J. RUSSELL Tonboted t the prornment what necessity was there for ar ariy ia tren trade? It seemed 
ish 6000, that the other 6000 should, in case they were | adhered-to the policy of non-inter The Chinese | to him that the object of the Goon was parent and 
requ: furnished by such one of the Powers as be | Indemnity. —In pe to T Gnsosox, the CHANCELLOR of the that they had thrown out a double net to catch the admirers of 
deemed expedient ; that the Pi should provide them with XOLO said that Aei received from China the French treaty, and, should thesenot be suffiaent, to include 
subsistence facilities for their movements, and that the | respect la y aco watts sd period of ay heat vias the Freetraders. He analysed at some length the provisions 
contin pean troops in Syria should be limited to | stipulated by ry treaty of Tien-tsin. he French | of the treaty, and argued that according to the true construc- 
six . The t Powers had also declared their disin- | had, however, succeeded in obtaining the first instal-| tion of it, and in honour and good faith, France ought to have 
in concluding the arrangem for intervention | ment of the indemnity due _ to ‘sins as they had | removed the prohibition on the export of The c 
rags. OUTS, 
rads to wait for the fulfilment 
© 
and their intention not to seek for exclusive an nadae a Aliren provi Amur ed = auae ae in ee treaty.— | then, for the House to take w 
influence, or He also stat hat ste been adjournment | of the contract. He maintained that if the representations of 
tak by orte for the of these 
territory on the Red River and Assiniboine ; the | tion of free-trade r protection and that the House 
superannua uation f rd Labourers : the pro romotion f to grant an ie a Thealternative offered by Mr. Puller 
TRO ae eee n Milita Or tl ` true, there was no room forthe id see 
included Soe = ofthe TREE in e on ry Organisa- he paper: makers nab hs 
y was 
service n the Crimea ; the Public Lunatic As ylum a reasonable one, and he would give it his 
the eath. | i r 
importance to Euro and everything ought to be done en was bro ought up and ‘ogee oct to, poe s then | with common sense, he had come to the conclusion that, as 
¥ və it.—In reply to a question ERBY, Lord | given to bring ina bill to carry the Barer fn inte, “effec t. | between England and France, all Customs duties were to be 
stated that the facts con oble conduct The "Heoi then went into committee of supply. The vote | tariffed on the English side, merely so as to canter bela 
Mr. Harvey, at Tyre, as stated e newspapers, were | of 39,9371. for the Houses of Parliament led to a protracted Excise duties charged on the native manufacture. On this 
quite correc referred, in eulogistic terms, to the i ebate =s the frescoes, statues, nrg decorations, in the | understanding, the assimilation of the Cus ms and. Excise taxes 
spirited and humane conduct of a Maho lady at Hasbeia = h the old question of the claim of Oliver | onpaperwas, he contended, directly and incontrovertibly derived. 
who had given refuge to 300 Christian women, and prevented z 
—Mr. H: id that the Attorney-General had evaded the 
mato a * p a was debated, and the . general r. HENLEY sai z 4 : tnd md 
eir massacre. — CLANRICARDE paid a Sealine reas Lone Opiniin appeared, that the Lord Protector was | real question at issue, He confessed he 
conduct of Abd-el-Kader. He dissented from the plans of aia not entitl T The vote was ultimately re- | how Vi ent ethe House a different 
Government and counselled far more vigorous airain duced by me j oe sont of the proposed statues of William IV. | duty on Hops if the seventh article of the treaty 
the effete Gov t of Turkey.—Lord ore and À ER pro} to ce the vote still | clus Lord Jous RussELL said that the difference between 
ought not because our feelings were ro dignation at | further by the omission of 1200.. for the Commons’ Corridor ; | the proposal to reduce the customs duty on paper and the 
occurred, rashly and entirely to change our policy in | but this amenant was negatived on a division by 67 to 44. | question of the export duty on fore’ rags was, that one was 
the East, which had materially contributed to the peace of | Mr. A. Smrrm moved a reduction of the vote by 30,000/. upon | expressly stipulated for in the treaty, whilst the other was not. 
Europe and the balance of-power in the wor The mo the ground that the vote of last year under this heud was un- | He condemned the amendment on th ‘ound. t. sought 
was then withdrawn. expended, and this amendme Bre negatived by 60 | by an evasion to get rid of a treaty obligation, and submitted 
Monpay,—The Royal Assent was given by Commission to the ba a e vote, now reduc was then agre at if the House gave it their approval they id stand 
Census (England een. moet ) Bills, and several ether Bills. rdered to be reported. The hee faaks of the day were | before Europe as an bly regardless o: 
The Industrial Museums (Scotland) Bill, Fa Tramways (Ireland) phy disposed of, and the House adjourned at 20 minutes te | faith. He called upon the House, on the ground o ena 
Bill, and vas Siy phd ese il? passed t thr 3 Selo to Monday: sadon not to present to the world the discredita blospectagie 
AL. aaa ntie eo ee —In answer to Mr. BERKE- a great nation running away from its. Stig e Morel a 
the CE of the EXCHEQUER said that in conse- frightened at the tigpgoblis cf protection: —M I mere said i 
Praia of the failure of the Atlantic Te’ aga PESE map in roe to con’ “esse iye if the House reje ected. = lutions 
their attempt to lay down a submarine line the e Chancel the Exchequer oe yane bè qui ofa 
reement entered into between them e 3 “Majesty's Breach of faith grig me e ; because thi jarag_slrendy takes 
Government, though not repealed, had become void. Looking | with regard to hops was a violation of the. treaty. France 
to the small success of deep-sea telegraphs, the Government apana taken time to consider the articles respecting iron, 
would exercise great caution in entertaining applications for | steel, yarn, and ians NE and it would be neither 
the construction of any similar telegraphs.—In reply to Mr. | unreasonable, dangero r unjust if the Government re 
Carrp, the LORD ADVOCATE said that it was the intention of | to avail themselves of ae same Seber which France 
the Government to appoint a commission to inquire into the | claimed for herself—Lord PALMERSTON expressed his opinion 
aem Fisheries. 
of CLANRI 
id not yt Sas 
on | state of the ect Abd-al- Kader . — In | that the Hi House had no alternative but to carry out the engage- 
answer to Mr. rotesting against 
ce 
that some settlement 
order for the com: 
A 
hundred 
the of the Excrrqven moved tI > Teso: | whic ; of the duty, paper, as & 
lutions of which he had given ice for red ETER duties | mai y i under the provisions of the 
on the: importation of aoe ee to at level’ the Excise | 7th article of the treaty. He hoped the House would 
duties imposed on the home-made modit ity. - first of | look at the matter in a plain, English, common-sense manner, 
these tem Sig T pplied es oan per yy e produc of France | and maintain the character of the country for honour ani 
iese- Algeria, and the second to ae manufactured in other | integrity in its relations with foreign nations. The House 
untries. The former had nsiderations attaching divided 4 
re ‘it a grew soe of the late Aes ercial treaty, in addition | The first resolution was then to. On the second reso- 
to those which w peida matter of polit whilst the peg naa lution being put, Mr. PULLER moved a similar amendment 
boa on the ground of pol icy alone. The gisi at iss with to it, but Mr. D: declining to give his sup- 
was a minute p as s respected th e Ae revenue and the dade port, it was negatived without a division, and the resolution 
- | to which it related, though, — effect of the diminu- | was agreed to. A further resolution, i ing the rate of 
tion of the duty would be to i rE A aiiin s revenue and | Duty on Wine according to the quantity of proof spirit, was 
—— a ‘manufacture. The exagger uences | also agreed to. The remaining orders were then disposed of, 
ticipa: apar rticular class from ane and the pre- | and the House adjourned at half-past 2 o'clock. 
dictions of ae 8 that must result to the English manufacturers, | Tuzspay.—Roman Catholic Charities Bill—The House went 
only showed that if true they had been the consumer | into committee on the clauses of this Bill, which were ite 
made in korit lo erate men of settled position in life from 
the action of the ballot.—The EARL of DERBY och wal 
aeeie i Ak eaea ies ‘Porecs (Insta) it was brought up 
and reduci: 
from the Commons and read a first time, the Earl of Gua the market by resorting to other sources “for sapplying t i Forces inti) Bil, Pa Dosson opposed the Bill, 
d. But the question was one of ‘great importance opposed’ by Sir H. Wirrovemey, Sir T Tors 
