Vo1 - l CYPERACEAE 109 



Cyperus ornatus R. Br.; Naves Novis. App. (1882) 303. 

 Cyperus pangorei Rottb.; Naves Novis. App. (1882) 304. 

 Cyperus radians Nees; Naves Novis. App. (1882) 305. 

 Cyperus sexflorus R. Br.; Naves Novis. App. (1882) 304. 

 Cyperus tegetiformis Roxb.; Naves Novis. App. (1882) 303. 

 Cyperus clavatus Lam.; Usteri Beitr. Ken. Philip. Veg. (1905) 131. 

 A lapsus calami; no such name occurs in botanical literature. 



Cyperus cruentus Rottb.; Boeck. in Linnaea 36 (1869) 338; Scheff. in 

 Nat. Tijdschr. Nederl. Ind. 34 (1874) 51; Naves Novis. App. (1882) 

 305. 



The Philippine record was based on Cuming 2372, which was from Ma- 

 lacca, not from the Philippines. 



Cyperus haematodes Endl. ; Steud. Syn. PI. Glum. 2 (1855) 44; Miq. Fl. 

 Ind. Bat. 3 (1856) 282; Naves Novis. App. (1882) 305. 



The type was from Norfolk Island; the Philippine record is due to 

 Steudel's error in transcribing the type locality as "Ins. Norf. Philipp." 



Cyperus lamprocarpus Nees in Hook. Journ. Bot. Kew Miscel. 6 (1854) 

 27; Boeck. in Linnaea 35 (1868) 490; Naves Novis. App. (1882) 306. 



The type is Cuming 2437, which was from Sumatra, not from the Phil- 

 ippines. It is supposed to be a synonym of Cyperus stoloniferus Retz. 



Cyperus tuberosus Rottb.; Miq. Fl. Ind. Bat. 3 (1856) 265. 



"Luzon ?" fide Miquel 1. c. The record must be an erroneous one as 

 the species is not known from the Philippines.' 



Cyperus minutiflorus Presl Rel. Haenk. 1 (1830) 351; Steud. Syn. PI. 

 Glum. 2 (1855) 52; Miq. Fl. Ind. Bat. 3 (1856) 287; Naves Novis. 

 App. (1882) 306; C. B. Clarke in Philip. Journ. Sci. 2 (1907) 

 Bot. 87. 

 Cyperus micranthus Presl Rel. Haenk. 1 (1828) 178, non Nees. 

 Cyperus breviflorus Dietr. Sp. PL 2 (1833) 316. 

 Cyperus multiflorus Kunth Enum. 2 (1837) 562 err. typ. 



"Hab. in insula Luzon." 

 Cyperus philippensis Presl Rel. Haenk. 1 (1828) 174; Steud. Syn. PI. 

 Glum 2 (1855) 52; Miq. Fl. Ind. Bat. 3 (1856) 287; Naves Novis. 

 App. (1882) 306; C. B. Clarke in Philip. Journ. Sci. 2 (1907) 

 Bot. 87. 



"Hab. in insula Luzon." It is desirable that the types of the last two 

 be examined as from the description I cannot place either of these satis- 

 factorily. Both are probably referable to some of the admitted species 

 listed above. 



Cyperus exaltatus Retz.; Naves Novis. App. (1882) 304; Ceron Cat. PI. 

 Herb. Manila (1892) 178; C. B. Clarke in Philip. Journ. Sci. 2 (1907) 

 Bot. 86. 



Vidal's specimen on which Ceron's record is based is C. elatus Linn, 

 fide C. B. Clarke in Philip. Journ. Sci. 2 (1907) Bot. 86. I suspect that 

 Llanos's plant cited by Clarke as C. exaltatus Retz. is either C. radiatus 

 Vahl or C. elatus Linn. 



